Japan's Nuclear Strategy
Time to Start a Nuclear Debate
Before his untimely death, former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe bravely initiated a discussion on Japan's nuclear strategy, calling for the country to consider nuclear sharing. He was the first Japanese statesman to publicly address this topic. Sadly, his life was cut short by an assassin's bullet, and the nuclear debate he initiated has since been silenced.
The debate on Japan's security issues has been dominated by the ideologically-biased and divisive discussion since the formation of the 1955 system—a domestic political system that featured the confrontation between the conservative Liberal Democratic Party of Japan and the Japan Socialist Party—following the internalization of the Cold War into the domestic politics. Real issues related to the national security are discussed only in secret at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Kasumigaseki and the Ministry of Defense Agency (then located at Roppongi). Even then, the issue of nuclear weapons was taboo.
As the Cold War proceeded, tens of thousands of nuclear weapons were produced and deployed; Japan, as the primary US ally in the Pacific, faced the threat of Russian nuclear warheads pointing at it; American nuclear weapons were brought to Okinawa under US military rule and to South Korea. Nonetheless, no mature discussion on nuclear strategy failed to emanate from Japan. Japan who is the only country on the globe that suffered atomic bombings in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, fails to have a strategy to protect its citizens from nuclear weapons. The reason for this lies in the domestic political environment under the 1955 system.
Under the 1955 system, the position of the government and the Liberal Democratic Party was to maintain the Japan-US alliance and to enhance Japan's defense capabilities. Defeated in the Pacific War, Japan was allowed to form only a medium-sized Self-Defense Forces. To counter the powerful communist blocs in the Far East of Russia, China, and North Korea, and especially to counter the threat of the Soviet military in the Far East with its massive nuclear arsenal and 400,000 troops, Japan needed to strengthen its national defense capabilities with the Japan-US alliance. With two prominent prime ministers, Shigeru Yoshida and Nobusuke Kishi, at the helm of government, post-war Japan swiftly restored its relations with the West, strengthened its defense posture, created a new military force named the Self Defense Forces, and joined the free trade system of the West, thereby working on the path to economic recovery.
In contrast, the Japan Socialist Party, the country's leading opposition party, approached the eastern camp led by the USSR. Many political parties in Western countries—the American Democratic Party, the British Labor Party, the French Socialist Party, the German Social Democratic Party, etc.— represent the interests of trade unions, but, unexceptionally, they have a distinct position of being members of the West. The JSP was the only opposition party in a major Western country that pledged its allegiance to Moscow. The Japanese Diet and public opinion split over many political issues due to the existence of the JSP, which, however, never came to power. As a result, Japan had not virtually been a member of the West as far as security policy was concerned until Prime Minister Yasuhiro Nakasone took office and declared, "Japan is a member of the West." In his famous book "World Order," Dr. Kissinger wrote of Japan in the 1970s, when he was in charge of US diplomacy, that "Japan placed itself legally in the camp of the developed democracies but—citing its pacifist orientation and commitment to world community—declined to join the ideological struggles of the age." He says that it was a country likened to a chimera. Unfortunately, this was an unbiased description of Japan at the time.
The "unarmed neutrality" policy proposed by the JSP is identical to one that Russian President Vladimir Putin now attempts to force on Ukrainian President Zelensky after his illegal invasion of Ukraine. Putin demands: "Sever ties with the United States. Be neutral and minimize your troops." This is the same with the "demilitarized neutrality" that the JSP advocated as Japan's security policy in the post-war era. It was nothing but representing Russia's interests while neglecting Japan's security.
In a situation without a national consensus on security, one of the most vehement Diet debates took place over the credibility of the US nuclear deterrent, or the so-called "nuclear umbrella." In the Diet debate, the JSP and the Japanese Communist Party tried hard to diminish the credibility of the Japan-US alliance.
In particular, the opposition parties focused on the issue of the US "introduction" of nuclear weapons into Japan. The "introduction" of nuclear weapons does not only mean their deployment on the ground, as in South Korea and Okinawa. It also means a call at a port for fuel supply by US Navy vessels equipped with nuclear weapons. Resolute not to allow even such a port call, the opposition parties argued against the "introduction" of nuclear weapons and tried hard to thwart the US nuclear strategy. To this end, they capitalized fully on the anti-nuclear sentiment of the Japanese people.
Attempts to ban US nuclear-carrying vessels from calling at Japanese ports as the "introduction" of nuclear weapons are no more meaningful than anti-nuclear propaganda. Since launching tactical nuclear weapons from US carrier-borne fighter aircraft, surface ships, and submarines is supposed to take place outside Japanese territory, Japan has no authority over their deployment or operation. Port calls for refueling and resupplying do not indicate that Japan will become involved in the US nuclear strategy. US "introduction" of nuclear weapons, in the true sense of the word, should mean landing nukes on the soil of a US ally, accompanied by a close discussion about their deployment and operation with the ally.
To begin with, the United States adopts a policy of "no declaration, no confirmation" as to whether or not to deploy nuclear weapons on carrier-borne fighter-bombers, surface ships, and attack submarines belonging to the US Carrier Strike Group in order to complicate calculations on the enemy's side. Japan's policy of not allowing nuclear-armed US warships to call at Japanese ports made no sense from the outset.
However, influenced by the intense anti-nuclear public sentiments, the Japanese government insisted that no nuclear weapons were carried on US vessels calling at Japanese ports as long as it received no prior notification. After the Cold War ended, the US removed nuclear weapons from all of its naval vessels, and the issue of bringing in nukes to Japanese ports vanished spontaneously. Later, under the Democratic Party of Japan administration, the fictitious scheme of introducing US nuclear weapons was revealed.
In this political atmosphere, the ideal of nuclear abolition drifted from reality, and many discourses went so far as to say that the practical theory of nuclear deterrence was at odds with the ideal of nuclear abolition. According to international common sense, nuclear abolition, nuclear arms control and disarmament, and nuclear deterrence are interrelated issues along a continuous policy line. Although nuclear abolition is an ideal, nuclear states are still fascinated by the destructive power of nukes and hold fast to them. Although arms control and disarmament progressed rapidly in the late Cold War years, a rising China was busy producing more nuclear weapons; outside the NPT regime, North Korea, India, Pakistan, and Israel, which did not officially admit the fact, became nuclear states. Countries sandwiched by nuclear states have no choice but to depend on the nuclear umbrella provided by their nuclear allies.
In Japan, however, many argued, "If we are committed to the ideal of nuclear abolition, we should not depend on the US nuclear deterrence." This was nothing more than a partisan and ideological argument consistent with Russia's interests at the expense of Japan's national security.
Prime Minister Abe's remarks quoted at the beginning of this essay jolted the boundaries of the nuclear taboo forged by the 1955 system. Abe did not state that nuclear sharing with the United States should start immediately but meant that Japanese political leaders are responsible for beginning a nuclear debate persuasive to the people.
At present, Russia publicly mentions the early use of tactical nuclear weapons in Ukraine, while North Korea is busy developing nuclear weapons and missiles to deliver them. Above all, China, which has begun to demonstrate its huge power, publicly states that it will annex Taiwan by force if necessary; the country is rapidly increasing its production of nuclear warheads. The CIA estimates that China's nuclear warheads will increase to 1,500 by 2035. That number is equal to that of nuclear warheads that the United States is allowed to deploy at any time under the now-suspended New START Treaty. Japan now stands at the bottom of the most dangerous nuclear valley in the world. At this juncture, it is not excusable for political leaders to evade public debate on the issue of nuclear deterrence. What are they escaping from in the first place? The people demand to be informed.
Improving the Credibility of the Nuclear Umbrella and Reassurance to Non-Nuclear Allies
When it comes to nuclear deterrence, a special psychological dynamic works between nuclear allies and non-nuclear allies, particularly when the non-nuclear allies are positioned at the front lines.
In 2018, when the INF Treaty between the United States and Russia was abrogated, Prime Minister Abe asked the present author to brief him on the matter. At that time, I said, "Germany, as a front-line state, is very sensitive to nuclear issues, which led to NATO's nuclear-sharing arrangement. Conversely, Japan has unconditionally trusted the United States regarding nuclear issues. From the US perspective, I think Japan is an easy country to deal with." Listening to my explanation, Abe frowned and sniffed. Perhaps he thought that the previous Japanese governments had been too irresponsible on nuclear issues.
West Germany was a front-line state during the Cold War. Germany split into two parts, and West Berlin was isolated in East Germany; huge phalanxes of Red Army tanks were arrayed beyond Hamburg in West Germany. Unlike today, an oppressive air hung over the city of Hamburg before the end of the Cold War. If deterrence were broken, the Red Army's tank corps would advance promptly. Unless tactical nuclear weapons were employed, there would be no way to stop the Soviet tanks. But if West Germany used nuclear weapons, the Warsaw Pact forces would also resort to nukes. The frontal opponents that West Germany would fight were the same ethnic Germans. If East and West Germany were exterminated by exchanges of nuclear weapons, the United States, Britain, and France would not engage in an all-out nuclear exchange with Russia but sign a cease-fire agreement, restoring peace in Europe—without Germany. The person who feared this most was West German Chancellor Helmut Schmidt, who took the lead in addressing the Euro-Missile Crisis of the 1980s.
This "sacrificial pawn psychology" haunts the non-nuclear allies on the front lines. Therefore, Germany chose to become entangled in the US nuclear strategy whenever possible.
During the Cold War, Germany confronted the mighty Red Army's tank corps; numerous US tactical nuclear weapons were brought into the country from the early stages of the war. At the time, those weapons passed simply as "big bombs." The credit for introducing those weapons belonged to a peremptory decision made by West Germany's resolute Chancellor Adenauer. As a significant quantity of US nuclear bombs found their way into the country, it was natural for Germans to inquire when and where to strike and to demand their involvement. In due course, they claimed involvement not only in the deployment but also in the operation of those weapons. The German Bundestag passed a resolution in the 1950s to acquire nuclear weapons delivery means. That desire was satisfied by the acquisition of dual-use fighter aircraft such as the F-16. Furthermore, Germany claimed NATO's independent operation of nuclear weapons; as a result, NATO's nuclear-sharing arrangement developed in which US nuclear bombs were deployed at air bases in Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and Belgium; ultimately, they were delivered to the air forces of these NATO allies. At present, 100 B61 air-dropped bombs are reported to be deployed in Europe as NATO nuclear weapons.
Japan's Nuclear Strategy
Unlike Germany, which was then on the brink of warfare, Japan was free from existential anxieties during the Cold War. War with Russia was no more than a European war; NATO was powerful. Tens of thousands of US nuclear missiles were pointed at Soviet Russia across the Arctic Ocean. A third world war would not happen so easily. From the 1970s onward, the Sino-Soviet conflict that had intensified following Stalin's death reached its zenith: China invaded Damansky Island in 1969 but received a painful counterattack from the Russian army, and a terrified China approached Japan and the United States. The strategic environment in the western Pacific front was stable; Japan's acquisition of nuclear weapons hardly made any sense. The US military also withdrew its nuclear weapons from Okinawa and the Korean Peninsula.
Today, however, China has markedly increased its nuclear and conventional arsenal, beginning to seriously consider the armed annexation of Taiwan. CIA Director Burns testified earlier this year that the Chinese leadership issued instructions to finish military preparations to that end by 2027.
Abstract nuclear strategy theories serve only in academe. Nuclear weapons are so devastating as to kill millions, but, after all, they are weapons. The use of nuclear weapons varies depending on specific war scenarios: in what terrain, by what countries, under what leaders, and for what interests actors are fighting. China and North Korea may have their nuclear doctrines. The Japanese government currently lacks the necessary measures to address the nuclear threat from those countries.
What Japan must first prepare for is a Taiwan war. The United States still adheres to a policy of ambiguity and has no intention of deterring a Taiwan contingency with nuclear weapons. Taiwan became a symbol of freedom in Asia thanks to the democratization led by President Lee Teng-hui. The United States will be sure to fight for Taiwan. The US Department of Defense is steadily making preparations based on the Taiwan Relations Act. In the US Congress, Republican conservatives, who traditionally support Taiwan, and left-wing Democrats, who have been increasingly anti-Beijing, are expressing their support for Taiwan.
However, the United States has no intention of putting Taiwan under its nuclear umbrella. Uncertainty surrounds how the United States intends to handle nuclear parity with Russia and China, the two main nuclear powers. China, which still lags behind the United States in nuclear warheads, has not yet joined any nuclear arms control and disarmament framework such as the New START Treaty between the United States and Russia. The US nuclear strategy regarding Taiwan is flawed in many respects, which increases the likelihood of a conflict.
If a Taiwan war happened, would China use nuclear blackmail against Japan? Or would it resort to nuclear attacks on Japan? What should Japan do to deter them? These are the main points in nuclear deterrence theory that Japan should contemplate.
In the event of a Taiwan war, there will be three options for Japan: (1) continue to provide bases for US forces under Article 6 of the Japan-US Security Treaty, (2) provide logistical support for US forces following the Law Concerning Measures to Ensure the Peace and Security of Japan in Situations that Will Have an Important Influence on Japan's Peace and Security, or (3) declare an existential crisis and exercise its right of collective self-defense. The US military could not fight a Taiwan war without involving Japan. It would not be too difficult for China to paralyze Japan through a missile saturation attack or cyber attack on US military bases, JSDF bases, and critical infrastructure on the Japanese mainland. Strategically, this would not be a sensible option for China because it would direct the military might of the Japan-US alliance against China.
China produced the famous strategist Sun Tzu, whose precept is: "To fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy's resistance without fighting." The way to win without fighting Japan is to horrify the Japanese people with nuclear blackmail, blow up the cabinet, and force Japan to leave from the front line.
At that juncture, Japan would confront the problem of how to manage the "sacrificial pawn psychology" likely to obsess the Japanese side, as was the case of Germany during the Cold War. This is a problem that Japan should bring up to the United States. A probable answer Japan could extract from the United States would be as follows: "The United States still possesses thousands of nuclear warheads; we outperform China in comprehensive strength in areas other than nuclear weapons as well, such as cyberspace, outer space, and submarine warfare. We have many allies on our side. Even if war breaks out, we will surely win. Trust us and reject China's nuclear blackmail."
If the United States and China were in a hair-trigger situation in which they would immediately launch an all-out nuclear war, the above answer would sound persuasive. However, a Taiwan war is no more than a localized war. Even if China employs nuclear weapons, there is no guarantee that the United States will retaliate with nuclear weapons. That said, if Tokyo were nuked, the United States would probably counterattack with nuclear weapons. But a demonstrative nuclear strike against a JSDF base on a remote island would not warrant a US nuclear response; the United States would rather choose a way to win a Taiwan war while avoiding the risk of a US-China nuclear war to the maximum extent. This is the real logic of war. An allied country to suffer atomic attacks would seek nuclear retaliation from the United States, but feelings of vengeance have nothing to do with a winning formula. The objective of war is a victory from beginning to end.
Then, it is natural for Japan, like Germany, to doubt that if a localized Taiwan war grew into a nuclear war at China's initiative, Japan might be obliged to play the role of a sacrificial pawn. Thus, the psychological gap is born between a nuclear and a non-nuclear state in a nuclear alliance. What excuse could the Japanese government offer to its citizens?
The Japanese government should not be satisfied with the US nuclear umbrella alone. As a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), Japan is not in a position to independently develop nuclear weapons. However, we should remember this. When the United States pressed Japan to join the NPT, its hidden motive was to prevent Japan's nuclear armament. To that end, the United States was considering deploying US nuclear weapons in Japan, as in the case of Germany. Were it not for the No. 5 Fukuryu Maru Incident, this might have been realized but did not come true. Pragmatic politicians like the then still young Shintaro Ishihara raised their voices, asking if Japan should abandon its nuclear option. The Japanese government extracted from the US government the guarantee of the nuclear umbrella. From the US perspective, it was a legitimate request on the Japanese side.
Since Japan renounced the production and possession of nuclear weapons, it has the right to demand that the US nuclear umbrella should be flawless. Then, what should be done to achieve this?
First, ensuring the complete effectiveness of the US nuclear deterrent is crucial. Within the United States, certain groups of anti-nuclear lobbyists allied with left-wing Democrats. Unfortunately, some militant activists sometimes prioritize their political advocacy over the security of allies.
The no-first-use of nuclear weapons is another example. President Obama, who received the Nobel Peace Prize for his push for a nuclear-free world, became impatient with the lack of results in the final days of his administration; then, he came up with the idea of no-first-use of nuclear weapons. Reportedly, the reaction of US allies, including Japan, was chilly. President Obama's prestige was undermined after the Crimean Peninsula was seized without resistance by Russia. Many were concerned that if President Obama said America would not use nuclear weapons first, countries with superior conventional forces might start wars in different theaters. Obama's proposal could have given a wrong message to the burgeoning Chinese military establishment. Fortunately, Obama's no-first-use of nuclear weapons policy was not adopted.
Second is the redeployment of sea-based tactical nuclear weapons such as nuclear Tomahawks. The United States removed all naval tactical nuclear weapons after the Cold War ended. It also banned the deployment of ground-based medium-range missiles until the expiration of the INF Treaty. In the meantime, China and North Korea increased their medium-range missiles at will. Some of them are mounted with nuclear warheads. China has acquired an asymmetrical capability—intermediate-range missiles—over the Japan-US-Japan alliance.
The responsibility rests with Japan to fill the conventional missile gap. The Kishida administration has said it will begin with purchasing 400 Tomahawks, but this is a "stopgap" measure. The administration must extend the flight range of Type 12 surface-to-surface missiles so that they can be launched from land, sea, and air platforms and increase their number to several thousand. China is said to have 2,000 missiles capable of reaching Japan. That number will continue to grow.
It is the strong who deter the weak, not the reverse. Deterrence works only when a strategic stance is established at every stage in a conflict to guarantee that any missile launched will be met with one in return. Japan cannot do this alone; it must work with the United States to build up a ladder of deterrence from conventional to nuclear forces. The absence of a counterattack capability (intermediate-range missiles) on the Japanese side is a crack in the deterrence bulwark of the Japan-US alliance. It is Japan's responsibility to fix it.
What about nuclear weapons? Should US tactical nuclear weapons be brought into Japan, they should be submarine-based nukes for second-strike use. Japan has no land borders with any country; it is immune from being overrun by massive tank corps. Japan has only to possess second-strike nuclear weapons to counter the enemy's nuclear attacks by firing back. If sea-based tactical nuclear weapons were deployed in the waters near Japan, China would believe that if it nukes Japan, those sea-based tactical nuclear weapons will likely, almost surely, be used in retaliation, if not going so far as to employ the US strategic nuclear weapons.
The nuclear Tomahawk was originally developed as a deterrent to protect the US Carrier Strike Group from a Russian nuclear attack. Japan should have the United States declare the revival of the decommissioned weapon and its potential use in retaliation for nuclear strikes against regional allies. This would send a message to China and, at the same time, be instrumental to reassure the Japanese people. As a result, the risk of political disintegration of the Japan-US alliance due to China's nuclear blackmail would diminish a great deal.
Nobukatsu Kanehara is Visiting Professor at Doshisha University.
- October, 2023, " Political and Social Divide in the United States and Challenges for Democracy" by Kazuhiro Maeshima, Professor, Sophia University
- October, 2023, " Has US Foreign Policy Doctrine Changed? " by Tsuneo Watanabe, senior Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- October, 2023, " America's Journey to Hegemony and Its Challenges" by Koji Murata, Professor, Doshisha University
- September, 2023, " A Medium- to Long-Term Outlook for the US Economy―Can America Win the Competition with China?―" by Tatsuhiko Yoshizaki, Chief Economist, Sojitz Research Institute, Ltd.
- September, 2023, " China's Strategy toward the U.S " by Toshiya Tsugami, Adjunct Researcher, the Japan Institute of International Affairs
- September, 2023, " The Deepening Security Dilemma in US-China Relations " by Ryo Sahashi, Associate Professor, the University of Tokyo
- July, 2023, "How Would North Korea and China Use Nuclear Weapons? -- Scenarios for Discussion" by Narushige Michishita, Professor at the National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies
- July, 2023, "Japan's Nuclear Strategy" by Nobukatsu Kanehara, Visiting Professor at Doshisha University
- July, 2023, "G7 Hiroshima Summit and Efforts for a Safer World Without Nuclear Weapons" by Nobushige Takamizawa, Visiting Professor at the University of Tokyo
- July, 2023, "Roundtable Discussion—Let's Talk Frankly About Nuclear Issues" by SSDP Discussion Members
- June, 2023, "Exploring the Possibility of Nuclear Attacks on Japan－Nuclear Simulations in the Era of "Three-Front Nuclear Threats" by Hiroyasu Akutsu, Professor, Heisei International University
- June, 2023, "China's Aim to Become a Nuclear Superpower" by Masafumi Iida, Head of China Division at the National Institute for Defense Studies
- June, 2023, "Challenges for Nuclear Arms Control in the Era of Strategic Competition Among Major Powers" by Nobumasa Akiyama, Professor, Hitotsubashi University
- June, 2023, "Mechanisms and Functions of Nuclear Deterrence－Development of US Nuclear Strategic Theory" by Masashi Murano, Research Fellow of Hudson Institute
- April 2023, "Changing NATO's "Achilles Heel"—Security in the Baltic Region" by Sanshiro Hosaka, Fellow,The International Centre for Defence and Security, Estonia
- April 2023, Evolution of European Security System - Visualization of Deterrence by NATO and the "Russian Problem" by Michito Tsuruoka, Associate Professor, Keio University
- April 2023, "An Expanded NATO's Nuclear Strategy" by Yoko Iwama
- March, 2023, "Germany's Civilian Power Model—Modification or Termination?--Germany Struggling with the War in Ukraine" by Toshiya Nakamura, Professor, Nagoya University
- March, 2023, "France and the Ukraine War―The Logic Behind Macron's Security Policy" by Ken Endo, Professor, The University of Tokyo
- March, 2023, "The Russo-Ukrainian War and the British Response: 2014-2023" by Yuichi Hosoya, Professor, Keio University
- March, 2023, "Where is America Heading—Implications and Challenges for the Allies" by Koji Murata, Professor, Doshisha University
December 2022, Proposal "Defending Our Country – Defense Policy in a New Cold War Era" was announced
- Front Cover
- Changes in the Security Environment Surrounding Japan - Shifting Power Balance and the Three Front Threats Ken Jimbo
- How Will "Japan Contingencies" Emerge? Osamu Onoda
- The Japan-US Alliance Revisited: Is it Dependable? Chikako Kawakatsu Ueki
- A New Phase of Defense Diplomacy and Defense Production and Technology Base Ippeita Nishida, Tsuneo Watanabe
- Intelligence Activities in the Post-Ukraine War Era Jun Nagashima
- Responding to the Nuclear Threat Masashi Murano
- No Time to Lose for Improving Japan's Defense Capabilities - Can the JSDF Defend the Homeland? - Ryoichi Oriki
- Toward the Formulation of a New "National Security Strategy" Hideshi Tokuchi
- October 2022, "Japan-China Relations under the Long-term Administration of Xi Jinping: Current Status, Prospects, and Expectations" written by Kazuyuki Suwa, Professor, University of Shizuoka
- October 2022, "China's Policy on the Global South --- China's World View and the Configuration of the US-China Confrontation " written by Shin Kawashima, Professor, the University of Tokyo
- October 2022, "Military Strategy of Xi Jinping's China" written by Bonji Ohara, Senior Fellow, Sasagawa Peace Foundation
- September 2022, " Social Governance by the Communist Party of China: The Present State and the Future Prospects " written by Kazuko Kojima, Professor, Keio University
- September 2022, "The Relationship between Domestic Politics and Diplomacy under the Xi Jinping Administration- Why Were the Large-Scale Military Exercises Decided?" written by Chisako T. Masuo, Professor, Kyushu University
- September 2022, "Xi Jinping's China--- Prospects for Its Climate Change Policy ---" written by Takashi Sekiyama, Associate Professor, The University of Kyoto
- August 2022, " Current Assessment of the Xi Jinping's Rule and Prospects for the Third Term of the Xi Administration " written by Takashi Suzuki, Associate Professor, Aichi Prefectural University
- August 2022, " Economic Challenges Awaiting the Xi Jinping Administration As it Enters its Third Term" written by Toshiya Tsugami, Director, Tsugami Toshiya's Works
- July 2022, "The Russian Invasion of Ukraine and the Future International Legal Order" written by Masahiro Kurosaki, Associate Professor, National Defense Academy
- July 2022, "The Ukraine War and Security in East Asia" written by Narushige Michishita, Vice President, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies
- July 2022, "How Will the Ukraine War Change the New US-China Cold War?" written by Yasuhiro Matsuda, Professor, the University of Tokyo
- July 2022, "Impact of the Ukraine War on the Global Economy" written by Tatsuhiko Yoshizaki, Chief Economist, Sojitz Research Institute, Ltd.
- June 2022, "Why War Occurs in Europe?--The Structural Transformation of the European Security Order in the Post-Cold War Era --" written by Yuichi Hosoya, Professor, Keio University
- June 2022,"The Russia-Ukrainian War and the Behind-the-Scenes Stance of the United States" "On Economic Security" written by Tsuneo Watanabe, Senior Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- June 2022, "The Russia-Ukraine War and NATO", written by Michito Tsuruoka, Associate Professor, Keio University
- June 2022, "The Ukrainian War Viewed from Theories of International Politics" written by Matake Kamiya, Professor, National Defens Academy
- March 2022, "Economic Security Challenges and Cyber Security" written by Jun Osawa, Senior Research Fellow, Nakasone Peace Institute
- March 2022, "On Economic Security" written by Matake Kamiya, Professor, the Ntional Defense Academy
- March 2022, ""Economic Security" and the Review of the 2013 NSS and the Related Strategy Documents" written by Nobushige Takamizawa, Visiting Professor, the University of Tokyo
- March 2022, "The US-China Rivalry and Economic Security" written by Yuzo Murayama, Professor, Doshisya University
- March 2022, "Japan's National Security Policies and Science and Technology" written by Nobukatsu Kanehara, Professor, Doshisya University
- March 2022, "Economic Security in the Free Trade Regime" written by Kazuto Suzuki, Professor, the University of Tokyo
- January 2022, "The 2022 South Korean Presidential Election and the Next Administration's Foreign and Security Policy" written by Junya Nishino, Professor, Keio University
- January 2022, "North Korea's Nuclear and Missile Development and Japan's Defense" written by Hideshi Tokuchi, Senior Fellow, GRIPS
- January 2022, "What will Become of Japan-South Korea Relations? The 1965 Japan-South Korea Treaty System in Jeopardy" written by Masao Okonogi, Professor Emeritus, Keio University
- December 2021, "Economic and Social Conditions in North Korea and its Relations with South Korea" written by Mitsuhiro Mimura, Chief Research Fellow, The Economic Research Institute for Northeast Asia.
- December 2021, "China's Korean Peninsula Policy and North Korea" written by Shin Kawashima, Professor, the University of Tokyo.
- December 2021, "China's Korean Peninsula Policy and North Korea" written by Shunji Hiraiwa, Professor, Nanzan University.
- December 2021, "What to Do with the Relations with North Korea?" written by Hitoshi Tanaka, Chairman for Institute for International Strategy at the Japan Research Institute.
- October 2021, "Strategic Implications of North Korea's Enhanced Nuclear and Missile Capabilities" written by Narushige Michishita, Vice President, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
- October 2021, "The Biden Administration's North Korea Policy: Its Low Priority and Looming Crises" written by Tsuneo Watanabe, Senior Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation.
- October 2021, "The Evolution of the US-ROK Alliance: Tasks in the Biden Era" written by Yasuyo Sakata, Professor, Kanda University of International Studies.
- September 2021, "The Development of Regional Security Architecture: From Asia-Pacific to Indo-Pacific" written by Ken Jimbo, Professor, Keio University.
- September 2021, "The Strategic Development of Japanese Security Cooperation under Superpower Competition and the Development of the FOIP and its Operationalization" written by Nobushige Takamizawa, Visiting Professor, Graduate School of Public Policy, The University of Tokyo.
- August 2021, "Security Perceptions of Central Asian Countries--- From the Perspective of China Studies ---" written by Shin Kawashima, Professor, the University of Tokyo.
- August 2021, "Security in the Indian Ocean Region---Implication of the Galwan Incident for QUAD in the Indo-Pacific" written by Dr. Satoru Nagao, Fellow (Non-Resident), Hudson Institute.
- August 2021, "Easternization and Security in Asia" written by Tsuneo Watanabe, Senior Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation.
- July 2021, "The Ideas of "Autonomy" and "Self-Reliance" in Contemporary India's Foreign Strategy" written by Kazutoshi TAMARI, Associate Professor,Chukyo University.
- July 2021, "Thailand's Security Policies and Threat Perceptions" written by Saya Kiba, Associate Professor, Komatsu University, Faculty of Intercultural Communication.
- July 2021, "Myanmar's Security Perceptions and the February 1 Coup d'Etat" written by Yoshihiro Nakanishi, Associate Professor, Kyoto University.
- July 2021, "Australia's Security Perceptions and the "Asia Threat"" written byTomohiko Satake, Senior Fellow, Defense Policy Division, Policy Studies Department, NIDS .
- June 2021, "The Indo-Pacific Regional Architecture: Its Future--- Multipolar Order Beyond US-China Relations ---" by Tsutomu Kikuchi, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
- June 2021, "The Quad Plus in the Security of Asia: Its Significance and Outlook" by Hideshi Tokuchi, Senior Fellow, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies
- June 2021, "Indonesian Views and Perceptions on National Security" by Nobuhiro Aizawa, Associate Professor, The Graduate School of Social and Cultural Studies, Kyushu University
- June 2021, "Normalized Tensions in the Cross-Strait Relations--- Structural Changes in Taiwanese Society and the Xi Jinping Administration's Strategic Shift ---" by Yasuhiro Matsuda, Professor, The University of Tokyo
- June 2021, "China's Maritime Strategy and Responses of the United States and Japan" by Yoji Koda, Former Commander in Chief, Self Defense Fleet
- June 2021, "The South China Issues from the Perspective of the International Law Order",by Shigeki Sakamoto, Emeritus Professor, Kobe University
- May 2021, "Indonesian Views and Perceptions on National Security" by Nobuhiro Aizawa, Associate Professor, Kyushu University
- May, 2021, "The Philippine Foreign and Security Policy Perspective" written by Yusuke Takagi Associate Professor,National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
- May, 2021, "Vietnam's Security: Challenges and Responses" written by Tomotaka Shoji Head, Asia and Africa Division, Regional Studies Department, National Institute for Defense Studies
- March, 2021, "Can the Biden Administration Restore America as a Global Leader?" written by Matake Kamiya, Professor, the National Defense Academy of Japan.
- March, 2021, "The Biden Administration and Japan's Security Strategy" written by Hideshi Tokuchi, Senior Fellow, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
- February,2021, "US Foreign and Security Policy Direction Viewed from the Biden Administration's Lineup" written by Tsuneo Watanabe, Senior Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- February,2021, "Trade Policies of the Biden Administration" written by Takaaki Asano, Senior Analyst, Sumitomo Corporation Global Research Co. Ltd.
- February,2021, "The Biden Administration's Policy toward Russia" written by Taisuke Abiru, Senior Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- January,2021, "Will US Policy Toward China Change?" lectured by Ryo Sahashi, Associate Professor, the University of Tokyo
- January,2021, "How will China View the Biden Administration?" written by Bonji Ohara, Senior Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- January,2021, "An Assessment of the 2020 US Presidential Election－American Democracy Now－" lectured by Fumiaki Kubo, Professor, the University of Tokyo
- January,2021, "Two Trumpian Mysteries－Why did Trump win over 70 million votes? Why is his outrageous behavior unchecked?－" lectured by Kazuhiro Maeshima, Professor, Sophia University
- September, 2020, "The Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic and Internationa Relationsl" by Matake Kamiya, Professor, National Defense Academy of Japan
- September, 2020, "The Policy Agenda for the Xi Jinping Administration- COVID-19 Countermeasures and China's International Relations -" by Shin Kawashima, Professor, The University of Tokyo
- "Control in the United States and International Relations" by Koji Murata, Professor, Doshisha University
- September, 2020, "The EU's Response to COVID-19 and International Relations" by Yuichi Hosoya, Professor, Keio University
- August, 2020, "The Corona Crisis Seen from a Macroeconomic Perspective" written by Motoshige Itoh, Professor Emeritus, The University of Tokyo
- August, 2020, "The Coronavirus Pandemic and Japan's Infectious Disease Control" written by Takashi Mihara, Senior Research Fellow, NLI Research Institute
- August, 2020, "Infectious Disease Crisis Control in Japan- Recommendations on an Exit Strategy -" written by Kazumasa Oguro, Professor, Hosei University
- August, 2020, "Security against Infectious Disease Threats --- Policy Responses Abroad" written by Takashi Sekiyama, Associate Professor, Kyoto University
- June 2020,"Transformation of the International Order in the Middle East--- Varying Degrees of "Stateness" and Three Directions of the New Order" written by Satoshi Ikeuchi, Professor, Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo
- June 2020,"Destabilization in the Middle East and its Impacts on Japan's Energy Security" written by Amane Kobayashi, Research Fellow, The Institute of Energy Economics
- May 2020: Urgent Recommendations "Toward a V-shaped Recovery after the Novel Coronavirus Pandemic "Coronavirus Testing for All" --- the First Step of the Next Phase"
- May 2020: "US Diplomacy toward Iran: Economic Sanctions as a Diplomatic Tool" Hiroki Sugita Columnist, Kyodo News
- "Russian Factors in the Middle East" Taisuke Abiru Senior Research Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- "The SDF Dispatches to the Middle East --- History and Significance" Ippeita Nishida Senior Research Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- March 2020, "Space and Security" Kazuto Suzuki Professor, Hokkaido University
- March 2020, "The US Security Space Policy --- With a Focus on the Establishment of Two Space Forces" Yasuhito Fukushima Chief Researcher, The National Institute for Defense Studies
- March 2020, "China's Recent Activities in Space and Cyberspace" Bonji Ohara Senior Research Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- March 2020, "Environmental Security and Japan" Takashi Sekiyama Associate Professor, Kyoto University
- March 2020, "Changes in Global Environment and Security --- US Security Strategy" Hideshi Tokuchi Senior Fellow, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS)
- February 2020, "Cyberspace Security" Motohiro Tsuchiya Professor, Keio University
- February 2020, "Japan's Space and Cyberspace Policy" Yukinari Hirose Former President of the National Institute for Defense Studies
- December 2019, "The US-China Confrontation --- Where Will Hegemony Reside Next?" Akio Takahara Professor, the University of Tokyo
- December 2019, "Challenges Facing the Chinese Economy" Osamu Tanaka Chief Senior Researcher, Institute of Developing Economies, JETRO
- December 2019, "US Strategic Perception on China: Implications for US Allied Partners" Tsuneo Watanabe Senior Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- November 2019, "The Xi Jinping Administration's View of the International Order– China's emphasis on United Nations diplomacy and liberal economic policies−" Shin Kawashima, Professor, the University of Tokyo
- November 2019, "The Future of China's Security Strategy" Hideshi Tokuchi, Senior Fellow, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies
- November 2019, "China --- Its Confidence and Anxiety" Bonji Ohara, Senior Research Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- August 2019: Several Perspectives on the Korean Peninsula Issue--- The Deteriorating Japan-South Korea Relationship and the Uncertain Denuclearization of North Korea --- By Masahiro Akiyama Chairman, the SSDP
- July 2019, "An Outlook on the Denuclearization of North Korea--- What is the Stance of North Korea?---", Junya Nishino, Professor, Keio University
- July 2019, "An Outlook on the Denuclearization of North Korea --- How will the US move?", Narushige Michishita, Vice President, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies
- July 2019, "Discussion on Denuclearization of North Korea", SSDP Discussion Meeting on May 8, 2019
- May 2019: "Current Status and Prospects of South Korea and Japan's Frictions over History: How to address the Judicial Problems", Masao Okonogi, Professor Emeritus, Keio University
- May 2019: "South Korea and Japan's Frictions over History" (Comments), Junya Nishino, Professor, Keio University
- May 2019: Japan and South Korea Relationships (Question & Answer)
- March 2019: "The Present State and Prospects of the Indian Economy and Economic Policies" written by Koji Kobayashi, Senior Economist Mizuho Research Institute Ltd.
- March 2019: "The "Modi diplomacy" in the History of Indian diplomacy--- Departure from or maintenance of the traditional diplomacy? ---" written by Toru Ito, The National Defense Academy of Japan
- February 2019: Dynamics of Indian Politics and the 2019 General Elections, written by Chiharu Takenaka, Professor of Rikkyo University
- February 2019: "Cooperative Strategy" to Realize "Competitive Strategy"--- The composite structure of Japan's "Free and Open Indo-Pacific" strategy (vision) ---, written by Matake Kamiya, Professor at The National Defense Academy of Japan
- January 2019:, A paper, "How will the US midterm elections results affect the Trump administration's foreign policy for 2019?" written by Tsuneo Watanabe, Senior Fellow, the Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- January 2019:, A paper, "The Present and Future of the International Trade Order" , written by Akihiko Tamura, Professor, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies
- December 2018: The US-China Competition and Japan, written by Ryo Sahashi, Professor at Kanagawa University
- December 2018: An Outlook for the US-China Trade War―What makes the two economically interdependent superpowers confront each other?―, written by Takashi Sekiyama, Associate professor at Toyo University
- September 2018: Proposal, "The Denuclearization of North Korea and the Restoration of Peace in the Korean Peninsula― Correct Perceptions and Eight Proposals on Japan's North Korea Diplomacy－" edited by the Society of Security and Diplomatic Policy Studies
- September 2018: "The Taiwan Policy of the Xi Jinping Administration in its Second Term: An Outlook on Cross-Strait Relations in the New Era" written by Yasuhiro Matsuda, Professor of the Tokyo University
- July 2018: "The EU States and Russia on North Korea Issues- Expansion of Influence through Diplomacy: Attempts and Limitations -" lectured by Yuichi Hosoya, Professor of Keio University
- "An Assessment of the US-North Korea Summit and an Outlook for the Future of the Korean Peninsula" lectured by Junya Nishino, Professor of Keio University
- "Korean Peninsula Issue and Japan's Future Security Policy" written by Hideshi Tokuchi, Senior Fellow of National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies
- July 2018: "US North Korea policy affected by personnel changes in the Trump administration" lectured by Tsuneo Watanabe, Senior Fellow of the Sasakawa Peace Foundation.
- "China-North Korea relationship under Xi Jinping" lectured by Shin Kawashima, Professor of the Tokyo University.
- "North Korean Denuclearization and Russia" lectured by Nobuo Shimotomai, Professor of the Hosei University.
- March 2018: "The Network Hegemony Theory for a Security Architecture in The Asia Pacific Region" lectured by Masahiro Akiyama, Chairman, the Society of Security and Diplomatic Policy Studies
- January 2018: "A Destabilized Middle East" lectured by Koichiro Tanaka, Professor, Keio University
- December 2017: "Problems in Sino-Japanese Relations, 1992-2042" lectured by Ezra F. Vogel, Professor of the Social Sciences Emeritus at Harvard University
- November 2017: "The Future of the Asia-Pacific Region" written by Yoriko Kawaguchi, Fellow, the Meiji Institute for Global Affairs, Former Minister Foreign Affairs
- October 2017: "A New Trend in India's Foreign Policy and Japan" Written by HIROSE,Takako, Professor, Senshu University
- August 2017: "The Shocks that shook the Transatlantic World and their Implication for Japan's Foreign Policy" written by HOSOYA, Yuichi, Professor, Keio University
- August 2017: "Does Economic Interdependence not Encourage Collaboration? ―Thinking Japan-China Relations from an Economic Perspective―" written by Takashi SEKIYAMA, Ph.D., Toyo University
- July 2017: Proposal article "The Trump Administration's Impact on the Cross-Strait Relations" written by Yasuhiro Matsuda, Ph.D.
- June 2017: Proposal article "The outlook for the relationship between two great powers and implications for Japanese diplomacy" written by Professor Shin Kawashima
- May 2017: (Emergency Proposal) Facing the Inconvenient Truth: Re-examining Policy for Peace and Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula (Chief author, Masao Okonogi)
- March 2017: "Economic Influences of the Trump Administration" written by Professor Motoshige Ito
- February, 2017: Proposal article "Trump's Foreign and Security Policy - Unpredictable President, Realistic Secretaries - " written by Mr. Tsuneo Watanabe is posted on the website of SSDP.
- December, 2016: Proposal article "Reconsidering North Korea Policy: How to Deal with a Nuclear Armed Divided States" written by Professor Masao Okonogi is posted on the website of SSDP.
- Taiwan-Japan Round Table on August 24th, at Capital Tokyu Hotel
- Japan-Korea Political Leaders Dialogue was held on February 10th,2023 at International House of Japan
- March 2022, A remembrance seminar "Remembering Professor Ezra Vogel" held on January 17, 2022
- March 2021, Japan-ROK Parliamentary Dialogue -Japan-ROK Cooperation in the Era of US-China Competition- held on March 11, 2021
- December 2020: The report of the Japan-ROK Future Dialogue held on November 21 to discuss "Japan-ROK Cooperation in the Post-Covid-19 Era
- October 2020: "Responses to COVID-19 and Agendas for the Post-COVID-19 Era", A Brief Overview of the Japan-Korea Experts Dialogue held on July 29,30, 2020
- October 2020: "The China-Taiwan Confrontation over Corona Response and Taiwan's Security" written by Makoto Ogata, Former Chief of the Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association in Taipei
- May 2020: "Rivalries in the Middle East in New Security Dynamics", Written by Sayed Ghoneim, Major General (retired) of the Egyptian Armed Forces, Chairman, Institute for Global Security & Defence Affairs
- March 2020: The Japan-South Korea Relationship in a Cul-de-Sac--- Where is an Exit ? Masao Okonogi Professor Emeritus, Keio Universit
- December 2019: The Hong Kong Upheaval and the Future of Cross-Straits Relations－The 2019 Japan-Taiwan Strategic Dialogue Report OGATA, Makoto Former Chief of the Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association in Taipei
- August 2019: Report; 2019 FUTURE CONSENSUS DIALOGUE --Sustainable Prosperity and Future of Korea-U.S.-Japan Cooperation-- By Future Consensus Institute (Yeosijae)
- June 2019: Report on India – Japan Security Dialogue 2019 by Ms. Vindu Mai Chotani, Ph.D Student, The University of Tokyo
June 2019: Four papers on Japan-India Cooperation submitted to India-Japan Security Dialogue 2019
Japan's Rationale for a Free and Open Indo-Pacific Vision
Tsuneo Watanabe, Senior Fellow, The Sasakawa Peace Foundation
The Significance and Possibilities of India-Japan Cooperation in the Concept of the Indo-Pacific
Toru ITO Associate Professor, National Defense Academy of Japan
Japan-India Defense Cooperation in the Indo-Pacific Context - Operationalizing the Security Aspect of the Indo-Pacific Vision –
Hideshi Tokuchi, Senior Fellow, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS)
India-US-Japan Defense Cooperation: What's next?
Dr. Satoru Nagao, Hudson Institute
- Japan's Rationale for a Free and Open Indo-Pacific Vision
- November 2018: "The Present State of the Japanese Economy and Policy Issues" lectured by Motoshige Itoh, Professor Emeritus at the University of Tokyo.
- November 2018: "Expanding Social Security Expenses and Fiscal Reforms" lectured by Kazumasa Oguro, Professor at Hosei University.
- September 2018: "Taiwan Identity and Cross-Strait Relations and Trump's Taiwan Policy and the Future of Taiwan-US Relations-Discussion at The Second Japan-Taiwan Strategic Dialogue (June 21, 2018, Taipei)-" written by OGATA, Makoto
- September 2018: "Japan-Taiwan Dialogue 2018 Minutes", 21st June 2018, Taipei, Taiwan.
- July 2018: Report on The Second Japan – Philippines Strategic Dialogue prepared by Ms. Vindu Mai Chotani, Ph.D. Student, Graduate School of Public Policy, Tokyo University.
- May 2018: "Civilian Control "at Crisis"? – Perhaps Not, for the Case of the Field Sit-reps from SDF's South Sudan Mission" reported by Ippeita Nishida, Research Fellow, the Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- January 2018: "Fukushima, Genki？Project－Young Taiwanese volunteers introduce the facts on Fukushima's revival through documentary films－" reported by OGATA, Makoto, Former Chief of the Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association in Taipei
- December 2017: "Commemorating a Quarter Century of Dispatches of the JSDF's PKO Units: Challenges and Possibilities in the Post South Sudan" written by Takayuki Shoji, Lecturer, Nihon University
- November 2017: "19th CCP National Congress" written by Mr. Bonji Ohara, Senior Research Fellow, the Sasakawa Peace Fondation
- October 2017: "What is Japan's Role in the Indo-China border conflict?" written by Dr. NGAO,Satoru, Research Fellow, Institute for Future Engineering
- July 2017: "Overview of the Current Situation in Taiwan-" the Naturally Independent Generation" will affect the Taiwan"s politics-" written by Makoto Ogata MGE.(Ret.)
- June 2017: "Japan-U.S. Economic Dialogue" written by Mr.Takaaki Asano
- March 2017: "The Japan-Philippines Strategic Dialogue" written by Mr. Hideshi Tokuchi
- February, 2017: Current topic "The Importance of Japan's Security Role Under Trump" written by Dr. Satoru Nagao is posted on the SSDP website.
- December, 2016: Current topic "Widening Security Task: Will SDF do the Job?" written by Mr. Ippeita Nishida is posted on the SSDP website.
- September 2023, Research journal "Security Studies vol5 no3" (Hegemonic America: Where It's Headed) in English edition was published.
- June 2023,Research journal "Security Studies vol5 no2" (Nuclear Crisis Scenarios Facing Japan and the Outlook of Nuclear Deterrence and Arms Control and Disarmament) in English edition was published.
- March 2023,Research journal "Security Studies vol5 no1" (What Will Happen to European Security?―Facing the War in Ukraine) in English edition was published.
- January 2023, Research Jounal "Security Studies (vol 4 no 4)" - Defending Our Country – Defense Policy in a "New Cold War Era - was published.
- October 2022, Research Jounal "Security Studies (vol 4 no 3)" - Xi Jinping's China - Politics, Economy, Society and Diplomacy - was published.
- Jun 2022, Research Jounal "Security Studies (vol 4 no 2)" -The Russia-Ukraine War and Its Global Impact- was published.
- March 2022, Research Jounal "Security Studies (vol 4 no 1)"-What is Economic Security?- was published.
- December 2021, Research Jounal "Security Studies (vol 3 no 4)"-Korean Peninsula Situation- was published.
- September 2021, A research journal "Security Studies vol03 no03" -Asia's Security II- (English edition)
- June 2021, A research journal "Security Studies vol03 no02" -Asia's Security I- (English edition)
- March 2021: Research journal "Security Studies (vol3 no1) "- US Foreign Policy in the Biden Administration / The 2020 US Presidential Election and American Democracy -(English edition)
- December 2020: A research journal "Security Studies (vol2 no4) "- Normalize Japan-South Korea Relations trough Dialogues -(English edition)
- September 2020: A research journal "Security Studies (vol2 no3) "-The Novel Coronavirus and Security-(English edition)
- July 2020: A research journal "Security Studies (vol2 no2) - Middle East Situation and Japan's Security - " (English edition) was published
- May 2020: A research journal "Security Studies (vol2 no1) - Cyber, Space, Environment and Security - " March 2020 (English edition)
- February 2020, "A research journal "Security Studies (vol1 no4) " (English edition)"
- September 2019: A research journal "Security Studies (vol1 no3) " (English edition)
- August 2019: Korea-Japan Joint Seminar: FUTURE CONSENSUS DIALOGUE
- April 2019: "Security Studies (vol1 no2) April 2019"
- March 2019: A research journal "Security Studies vol1 no01" just published
- February 2019: The Denuclearization of North Korea and the Takeshima Issue
- December 2018: Former Vice Defense Minister Masahiro Akiyama's Memoirs (An Ad)
- November 2018: Participation in the Future Consensus Forum held in Beijing
- September 2018: "2018 Indo-Pacific Security Dialogue" reported by Masahiro Akiyama
- 2017 December: "The Butterfly Project-A possibility of showing a solution to the North Korea problem-"
- October 2017: Campaign on the problems with North Korea
- August 2017: A New Containment Policy Strategy
- June 2017: Korean peninsla
- March 2017: President Duterte
- February, 2017: Kazakhstan
- November, 2016: Participated in Astana Club 2016 held in Kazakhstan on November 14- 16, 2016.