The Biden Administration and Japan's Security Strategy
Senior Fellow, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies
The United States has long played a leading role in international security, but it has not played the role of the world's policeman. The United States often declares that it will cease to be the world's policeman. 1 Needless to say, a "policeman" in the ordinary sense of the word does not exist in a modern international society of coexisting sovereign states. Speaking as Robert Scalapino does, the United States has been more of a "firefighter." 2
The image of Trump's America was that of a fireman past his prime going around lighting fires here and there. But the United States is not a country resigned to lag behind other countries; it will not continue to decline unless it neglects necessary investment for the future. It will become conscious again of its role as a firefighter.
Whether or not Joe Biden's victory is a sign of US resilience has yet to be seen. Whether or not the declaration in his inaugural address --- "We will repair our alliances and engage with the world once again"; "We will be a strong and trusted partner for peace, progress, and security." 3 --- will come true will be a significant question for Japan --- a US ally and a beneficiary of the rules-based international order.
2. Formulation of Japan's "National Security Strategy (NSS)" and After
This paper will discuss the implications of the Biden administration's national security strategy for Japan. First, let us review the contents of Japan's security strategy as outlined in the "National Security Strategy (NSS)" 4 formulated in 2013.
This document focuses on the unprecedented changes in the balance of power among nations due to the rise of emerging powers such as China and India, the progress of globalization, and the rapid development of technological innovation. For Japan to play a more active role as a major player in the international community, the NSS articulates a "proactive contribution to peace based on international cooperation," and identifies as strategic approaches: (1) strengthening and expanding Japan's capabilities and role, (2) strengthening the Japan-US alliance, and (3) promoting diplomatic and security cooperation with partners.
The National Defense Program Guidelines (NDPG), 5 which took effect simultaneously with the NSS, was revised five years later in 2018, 6 but the NSS has not undergone revision. 7 However, the world has undergone significant changes in the past five years. With the advent of the Trump administration, the lack of US leadership and the reduction of its credibility and predictability became pronounced. The Trump administration's National Security Strategy advocated the maintenance of peace by power 8 and the strengthening of existing alliances and partnerships. 9 But the actual conduct of the United States was contrary to this, and the inconsistency between its words and deeds led to growing distrust of the country. The Trump administration concluded that the US policy of engagement with China was a failure. Thus, the United States intensified its confrontational stance with China.
On the other hand, China is projecting its growing presence in the international community and is rapidly and opaquely building up its military power. In the South China Sea, one of the hotspots in East Asia, China has, since 2014, fast advanced large-scale land reclamation in seven features of the Spratly Islands. Rejecting the 2016 ruling of the Permanent Court of Arbitration, it does not cease to make its control of the waters a fait accompli.
North Korea conducted three nuclear tests in 2016 and 2017 and declared the "completion of the national nuclear-armed forces" in 2017. In 2018, Kim Jong-un pledged his commitment to "denuclearization" at the North-South Korea Summit and the US-North Korea Summit. But North Korea's nuclear development is still underway and continues to pose a primary threat to the international community, along with the country's growing ballistic missile capabilities. In January 2021, Kim Jong-un declared the development of "ultra-modern tactical nuclear weapons" and solid-fueled intercontinental ballistic missiles.
Russia annexed Crimea in 2014 and then pursued its control of the Crimean Peninsula. In the meantime, the implementation of the Minsk agreement has not progressed as planned.
And at present, in contrast to non-traditional security challenges such as piracy and large-scale natural disasters that resulted In the promotion of cooperation among states, pandemics are intensifying competition and confrontation among great powers. East Asia, where Japan is situated, is the main battleground of such competition and confrontation. Meanwhile, as globalization is further progressing, Japan's security is also facing the challenges posed by globalization.
The 2018 NDPG offers a perception that the security environment surrounding Japan is "becoming increasingly severe and uncertain at a much faster pace" than envisaged in 2013 when the NSS took effect. 10 The NDPG describes the current security environment as "a reality that we have never faced" 11 and indicates a recognition that we are obliged to make fundamental changes to our defense capabilities without being bound by conventional thinking. 12
Nevertheless, the NSS was not revised. The Japanese government recognized that: "The current NSS points out that unprecedented changes in the balance of power in the international society and rapid progress in technological innovation have a significant and complex impact on the security environment in the global and Asia-Pacific regions. The current security environment and national security challenges require continued assessment regarding their medium- and long-term directions but are considered as a whole to be within the scope of the basic perceptions set forth by this strategy." 13
However, the United States in 2013 is the United States before the Trump administration came into power. 14 Besides, the main area of concern of this document is the "Asia-Pacific region," including Japan, and the significance and role of the Japan-US alliance are discussed mainly in the context of the "Asia-Pacific region." The concept of "Indo-Pacific" had not yet appeared. Later, after the Japanese Prime Minister's speech at TICAD IV in August 2016, Japan raised the "Free and Open Indo-Pacific" vision. It is a multi-faceted initiative; one of its three pillars is "efforts for peace and stability," which has undeniable security implications. 15 In the 2018 NDPG, "Asia-Pacific" was replaced by "Indo-Pacific," and the significance and role of the Japan-US alliance were also discussed in the context of the "Indo-Pacific." 16 Furthermore, the "vision of a free and open Indo-Pacific" was referred as a guideline to be taken into account in security cooperation with other countries. 17
3. The Direction of the Biden Administration's Security Strategy
Unlike the Trump administration, the Biden administration will formulate a security policy that emphasizes cooperation with allies. However, now that trust in the United States has declined, it is uncertain whether US allies will follow it even if it emphasizes alliances, holding to the same principles as in the past. 18 Although the Biden administration is setting a different direction from the Trump administration, it will continue to maintain a hard-line stance against China for the time being. In a January 2020 Foreign Affairs magazine article, 19 Biden argued for the necessity of being tough on China and, as the most effective way to counter China, he called for the shaping of a united front with allies and partners to address China's injustices and human rights abuses. 20 Similar remarks appear in his statement issued in the wake of the December 28 meeting with the national security transition teams. 21
In any case, the Biden administration's policy priority seems to be on climate change and pandemics, judging from the order in which policy issues are discussed. 22 Although not mentioned in the December 28 statement, in which Biden emphasizes the importance of alliance relations, he states in his Foreign Affairs article that the United States will cooperate with the Chinese government on such issues where their interests are aligned with each other as on climate change, non-proliferation, and global health security, to name a few. 23 The position of cooperating with China on security issues where interests are aligned was once part of the constructive engagement policy of the Obama administration and not denied altogether by the Trump administration 24 Biden's position, however, is different from his predecessors' in that it is similar to that of Kurt Campbell and Sullivan, who advocated competition and cooperation with China to coexist with it on terms favorable to the United States. 25 Campbell and Sullivan aim for a path between containment and a grand bargain, arguing that the US policy goal is to establish favorable terms of coexistence with China in four key domains --- military, economic, political, and global governance. 26
Also, Campbell and Sullivan argue that unlike the military competition between the United States and the Soviet Union during the Cold War, the US-China crisis will be limited to the Indo-Pacific region and that "the United States must accept that military primacy will be difficult to restore." 27 They also suggest a reexamination of US military investment and presence in the region to guarantee deterrence in the region. 28
It is the argument of Kathleen Hicks and others that echoes that of Campbell and Sullivan. On the premise that US global primacy has declined and is unlikely to be restored, they argue that cooperation with partner nations is essential to the United States and that the use of military force should be secured primarily for deterring China and Russia and for providing reassurance to allies and partners. The authors place the Indo-Pacific as the region of the greatest attention, followed by Europe, and call for a reduction in existing military commitments outside Asia. They also recommend securing the competitiveness of the defense industrial base to maintain US technological superiority over geopolitical competitors, reducing legacy platforms to prioritize the development of advanced capabilities, and limiting defense equipment and technology cooperation to a limited number of allies to enhance their self-defense capabilities. 29 Based on the recognition that US superiority is not as strong as it used to be, Hicks also anticipates that the United States should strengthen the potential of allies against China and Russia, while US allies should take primary responsibility for their defense. At the same time, she considers it necessary for the United States to maintain troop deployments, especially in Asia and Europe, to give credibility to US commitments to allies and threats against enemies. Furthermore, Hicks recommends that the US military should put its budgetary focus on the enhancement of readiness rather than on its size. 30
The general direction of future US security policy, especially defense policy, can be outlined as follows: (1) emphasize the Indo-Pacific region, (2) maintain a competitive relationship with China, while promoting cooperation with China over some issues, including the strengthening of crisis management, (3) pursue technological superiority rather than quantitative superiority in military power, and (4) invest in relationships with allies and partners, while pursuing US national interests through coordination with them, and (5) increase the efficiency of US military resources with growing expectations for US allies to defend themselves.
4. The Future of Japan's Security Strategy
It is not clear whether the Biden administration, faced with many major domestic challenges, will be able to repair relations with allies that have witnessed the vulnerability and "ulterior motives" of the United States over the past four years, and will be able to exercise leadership in restoring the rules-based international order. It is also uncertain if it ultimately fails and ends in mere words.
As long as Japan does not have the option of defending itself on its own, 31 it is unlikely that the axis of Japan's security policy --- the Japan-US alliance --- would change unless it wanted to join forces with China to counter the United States. However, the US-Japan alliance is a relationship of mutual cooperation, which requires constant adjustment. The Trump era was one of the major adjustment phases; we are now also entering a new adjustment phase.
Japan has chosen the Japan-US alliance cooperation as one of the means to ensure its security. It is not the United States that will defend Japan. Japan must defend itself. Japan must be aware of this fact more than ever before. The shift from "America First" to "Emphasis on Alliances" will not mean that the United States will become more generous. If Japan considers the Japan-US alliance to be a mainstay of its security, it is only natural for Japan to invest in it regardless of US moves. It is Japan's sense of ownership that is being questioned.
With the above in mind, I would like to discuss points to which we should pay attention regarding some topics related to the Japan-US alliance, especially in relation to the behavior of the Biden administration.
(1) The "Free and Open Indo-Pacific" Vision
The Trump administration promoted the "free and open Indo-Pacific" strategy and tried to adjust it with similar initiatives pursued by other countries in the region. The 2020 Democratic Party Platform uses the term "Asia Pacific" to describe the party's policy toward the region to the effect that the United States will work with allies and partners to promote shared prosperity, security, and values, while being tough on China. But there is no mention of the "free and open Indo-Pacific" in the document. 32 After his election victory, Biden has consistently used the term "a secure and prosperous Indo-Pacific" in his talks with heads of state and government. 33 Biden may have been simply avoiding using the same terminology as the previous administration. We should not read too much from it, but it has been pointed out that this may be an attempt to shift from a values- and principles-oriented approach to a more pragmatic direction to gain broad support from Southeast Asian countries. 34
If, as Bilahari Kausikan has stated, the document titled "US Strategic Framework for the Indo-Pacific," which was declassified on January 5, has "an enduring and nonpartisan quality" and "contains nothing that any experienced foreign policy practitioner like Kurt Campbell should fundamentally disagree with", 35 then Biden's "secure and prosperous Indo-Pacific" may be little more than a name change. If this is the case, Japan will continue to promote the "Free and Open Indo-Pacific" vision based on its existing policy and cooperation with the Biden administration. Japan, which has not necessarily internalize Western values, being more pragmatic, may find it easier to advance cooperation based on the concept that does not emphasize Western values. Also, if Biden's "secure and open Indo-Pacific" becomes more acceptable to Southeast Asian countries, it will be convenient for Japan, which "strongly supports" "the ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific" and wants to cooperate with ASEAN "for further prosperity of a free and open Indo-Pacific." 36 If the essence of the US initiative remains unchanged, there may not be a noticeable change either in the ASEAN side's response --- which, at least, will not be a negative for ASEAN-Japan cooperation.
Yet, if the Biden administration's "Indo-Pacific" emphasizes "security" and its aspect of security strategy, Japan's "Free and Open Indo-Pacific" initiative may have to emphasize its aspect of security policy more than before.
The "Free and Open Indo-Pacific" vision is not seen in Japan's NSS, and the 2018 NDPG only states that Japan's security cooperation with other countries should be "based on the vision of a free and open Indo-Pacific." 37 How to position this concept in the NSS may become a future issue. 38
(2) Defense of the Senkaku Islands
The Senkaku Islands, over which China is waging a gray-zone warfare, occupy a vital position in the face of China's maritime expansion. Meanwhile, the defense of the islands is significant also for the Japan-US alliance. It may be possible to understand that this recognition is implied, for example, by the so-called Armitage Nye Report of December 2020. 39
The Japanese official readout of the Suga-Biden telephone talk following the presidential election stated that "President-elect Biden expressed his commitment that Article 5 of the Japan-US Security Treaty applies to the Senkaku Islands," 40 while there is no mention of such commitment in the US announcement. 41 Some media coverage points out the difference between the two announcements. 42 But it is feared that such media coverage may help disseminate in the United States an image of Japan eager to confirm US commitment to the Senkaku Islands but indifferent to Taiwan. Now that interest in Taiwan is growing in Washington, there is always the possibility that Japan's response to a Taiwan contingency (including the question related to combat operations from US bases in Japan) will be questioned, regardless of the probability of a Taiwan contingency. 43
(3) North Korea's nuclear and missile development
The North Korea issue is one that Trump confused, too. The Biden administration's efforts to address this issue will be worth attention. In a January 22 press briefing, a White House spokesperson said that the White House would conduct a thorough review of its policy toward North Korea in close coordination with South Korea, Japan, and other allies, and consider current pressures against North Korea as well as future diplomatic possibilities. 44 But Biden's Foreign Affairs magazine article includes only a brief passage on the North Korea issue. 45 And it is preceded by a sentence, "On nonproliferation and nuclear security, the United States cannot be a credible voice while it is abandoning the deals it negotiated." The future direction of US response, including the priority of the North Korea issue, is not visible.
If assuming that the denuclearization of North Korea will be difficult to achieve in the short term, a freeze proposal like those set forth by Sue Mi Terry 46 and Victor Cha 47 is being considered in the Biden administration, Japan will be placed in a delicate position, as those authors admit. As the credibility of the United States declines, this is more likely to raise concerns than to be appreciated as a pragmatic approach.
This North Korea denuclearization issue also poses the question of burden-sharing between the United States and Japan. Terry urges, "Instead of continuing excessive demands that will rupture our alliances, the U.S. should encourage more realistic, incremental increases in their (Japan and South Korea's) burden-sharing contributions." 48
With a negative outlook on the denuclearization of North Korea, Richard Lawless proposes, as a credible way for Japan to strengthen US deterrence capabilities, the deployment in Japan of the next-generation INF systems currently under development or the INF systems deployed aboard jointly crewed ballistic missile submarines. 49 The new INF systems expected to be put to practical use within a few years will require bilateral coordination regarding not only deployment but also targeting and other operational aspects. Enhancement of communications between the two countries on issues related to arms control will also be essential.
Although it is too early for us to tell when the Biden administration will announce its "National Security Strategy," 50 its direction will be visible sooner or later. What is required of Japan is to show wisdom to act with the United States to strengthen the rules-based international order, not to "bargain" the price set by the United States to see how it will respond. First of all, Japan must work out its strategy.
The 10-year period envisaged by the 2013 NSS will be over in due course. But since the world has already undergone large-scale changes, including the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the US government changed twice during the period, it would not be a bad idea for Japan to make a swift, flexible review of the NSS.
- January 2022, "The 2022 South Korean Presidential Election and the Next Administration's Foreign and Security Policy" written by Junya Nishino, Professor, Keio University
- January 2022, "North Korea's Nuclear and Missile Development and Japan's Defense" written by Hideshi Tokuchi, Senior Fellow, GRIPS
- January 2022, "What will Become of Japan-South Korea Relations? The 1965 Japan-South Korea Treaty System in Jeopardy" written by Masao Okonogi, Professor Emeritus, Keio University
- December 2021, "Economic and Social Conditions in North Korea and its Relations with South Korea" written by Mitsuhiro Mimura, Chief Research Fellow, The Economic Research Institute for Northeast Asia.
- December 2021, "China's Korean Peninsula Policy and North Korea" written by Shin Kawashima, Professor, the University of Tokyo.
- December 2021, "China's Korean Peninsula Policy and North Korea" written by Shunji Hiraiwa, Professor, Nanzan University.
- December 2021, "What to Do with the Relations with North Korea?" written by Hitoshi Tanaka, Chairman for Institute for International Strategy at the Japan Research Institute.
- October 2021, "Strategic Implications of North Korea's Enhanced Nuclear and Missile Capabilities" written by Narushige Michishita, Vice President, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
- October 2021, "The Biden Administration's North Korea Policy: Its Low Priority and Looming Crises" written by Tsuneo Watanabe, Senior Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation.
- October 2021, "The Evolution of the US-ROK Alliance: Tasks in the Biden Era" written by Yasuyo Sakata, Professor, Kanda University of International Studies.
- September 2021, "The Development of Regional Security Architecture: From Asia-Pacific to Indo-Pacific" written by Ken Jimbo, Professor, Keio University.
- September 2021, "The Strategic Development of Japanese Security Cooperation under Superpower Competition and the Development of the FOIP and its Operationalization" written by Nobushige Takamizawa, Visiting Professor, Graduate School of Public Policy, The University of Tokyo.
- August 2021, "Security Perceptions of Central Asian Countries--- From the Perspective of China Studies ---" written by Shin Kawashima, Professor, the University of Tokyo.
- August 2021, "Security in the Indian Ocean Region---Implication of the Galwan Incident for QUAD in the Indo-Pacific" written by Dr. Satoru Nagao, Fellow (Non-Resident), Hudson Institute.
- August 2021, "Easternization and Security in Asia" written by Tsuneo Watanabe, Senior Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation.
- July 2021, "The Ideas of "Autonomy" and "Self-Reliance" in Contemporary India's Foreign Strategy" written by Kazutoshi TAMARI, Associate Professor,Chukyo University.
- July 2021, "Thailand's Security Policies and Threat Perceptions" written by Saya Kiba, Associate Professor, Komatsu University, Faculty of Intercultural Communication.
- July 2021, "Myanmar's Security Perceptions and the February 1 Coup d'Etat" written by Yoshihiro Nakanishi, Associate Professor, Kyoto University.
- July 2021, "Australia's Security Perceptions and the "Asia Threat"" written byTomohiko Satake, Senior Fellow, Defense Policy Division, Policy Studies Department, NIDS .
- June 2021, "The Indo-Pacific Regional Architecture: Its Future--- Multipolar Order Beyond US-China Relations ---" by Tsutomu Kikuchi, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
- June 2021, "The Quad Plus in the Security of Asia: Its Significance and Outlook" by Hideshi Tokuchi, Senior Fellow, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies
- June 2021, "Indonesian Views and Perceptions on National Security" by Nobuhiro Aizawa, Associate Professor, The Graduate School of Social and Cultural Studies, Kyushu University
- June 2021, "Normalized Tensions in the Cross-Strait Relations--- Structural Changes in Taiwanese Society and the Xi Jinping Administration's Strategic Shift ---" by Yasuhiro Matsuda, Professor, The University of Tokyo
- June 2021, "China's Maritime Strategy and Responses of the United States and Japan" by Yoji Koda, Former Commander in Chief, Self Defense Fleet
- June 2021, "The South China Issues from the Perspective of the International Law Order",by Shigeki Sakamoto, Emeritus Professor, Kobe University
- May 2021, "Indonesian Views and Perceptions on National Security" by Nobuhiro Aizawa, Associate Professor, Kyushu University
- May, 2021, "The Philippine Foreign and Security Policy Perspective" written by Yusuke Takagi Associate Professor,National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
- May, 2021, "Vietnam's Security: Challenges and Responses" written by Tomotaka Shoji Head, Asia and Africa Division, Regional Studies Department, National Institute for Defense Studies
- March, 2021, "Can the Biden Administration Restore America as a Global Leader?" written by Matake Kamiya, Professor, the National Defense Academy of Japan.
- March, 2021, "The Biden Administration and Japan's Security Strategy" written by Hideshi Tokuchi, Senior Fellow, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
- February,2021, "US Foreign and Security Policy Direction Viewed from the Biden Administration's Lineup" written by Tsuneo Watanabe, Senior Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- February,2021, "Trade Policies of the Biden Administration" written by Takaaki Asano, Senior Analyst, Sumitomo Corporation Global Research Co. Ltd.
- February,2021, "The Biden Administration's Policy toward Russia" written by Taisuke Abiru, Senior Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- January,2021, "Will US Policy Toward China Change?" lectured by Ryo Sahashi, Associate Professor, the University of Tokyo
- January,2021, "How will China View the Biden Administration?" written by Bonji Ohara, Senior Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- January,2021, "An Assessment of the 2020 US Presidential Election－American Democracy Now－" lectured by Fumiaki Kubo, Professor, the University of Tokyo
- January,2021, "Two Trumpian Mysteries－Why did Trump win over 70 million votes? Why is his outrageous behavior unchecked?－" lectured by Kazuhiro Maeshima, Professor, Sophia University
- September, 2020, "The Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic and Internationa Relationsl" by Matake Kamiya, Professor, National Defense Academy of Japan
- September, 2020, "The Policy Agenda for the Xi Jinping Administration- COVID-19 Countermeasures and China's International Relations -" by Shin Kawashima, Professor, The University of Tokyo
- "Control in the United States and International Relations" by Koji Murata, Professor, Doshisha University
- September, 2020, "The EU's Response to COVID-19 and International Relations" by Yuichi Hosoya, Professor, Keio University
- August, 2020, "The Corona Crisis Seen from a Macroeconomic Perspective" written by Motoshige Itoh, Professor Emeritus, The University of Tokyo
- August, 2020, "The Coronavirus Pandemic and Japan's Infectious Disease Control" written by Takashi Mihara, Senior Research Fellow, NLI Research Institute
- August, 2020, "Infectious Disease Crisis Control in Japan- Recommendations on an Exit Strategy -" written by Kazumasa Oguro, Professor, Hosei University
- August, 2020, "Security against Infectious Disease Threats --- Policy Responses Abroad" written by Takashi Sekiyama, Associate Professor, Kyoto University
- June 2020,"Transformation of the International Order in the Middle East--- Varying Degrees of "Stateness" and Three Directions of the New Order" written by Satoshi Ikeuchi, Professor, Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo
- June 2020,"Destabilization in the Middle East and its Impacts on Japan's Energy Security" written by Amane Kobayashi, Research Fellow, The Institute of Energy Economics
- May 2020: Urgent Recommendations "Toward a V-shaped Recovery after the Novel Coronavirus Pandemic "Coronavirus Testing for All" --- the First Step of the Next Phase"
- May 2020: "US Diplomacy toward Iran: Economic Sanctions as a Diplomatic Tool" Hiroki Sugita Columnist, Kyodo News
- "Russian Factors in the Middle East" Taisuke Abiru Senior Research Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- "The SDF Dispatches to the Middle East --- History and Significance" Ippeita Nishida Senior Research Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- March 2020, "Space and Security" Kazuto Suzuki Professor, Hokkaido University
- March 2020, "The US Security Space Policy --- With a Focus on the Establishment of Two Space Forces" Yasuhito Fukushima Chief Researcher, The National Institute for Defense Studies
- March 2020, "China's Recent Activities in Space and Cyberspace" Bonji Ohara Senior Research Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- March 2020, "Environmental Security and Japan" Takashi Sekiyama Associate Professor, Kyoto University
- March 2020, "Changes in Global Environment and Security --- US Security Strategy" Hideshi Tokuchi Senior Fellow, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS)
- February 2020, "Cyberspace Security" Motohiro Tsuchiya Professor, Keio University
- February 2020, "Japan's Space and Cyberspace Policy" Yukinari Hirose Former President of the National Institute for Defense Studies
- December 2019, "The US-China Confrontation --- Where Will Hegemony Reside Next?" Akio Takahara Professor, the University of Tokyo
- December 2019, "Challenges Facing the Chinese Economy" Osamu Tanaka Chief Senior Researcher, Institute of Developing Economies, JETRO
- December 2019, "US Strategic Perception on China: Implications for US Allied Partners" Tsuneo Watanabe Senior Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- November 2019, "The Xi Jinping Administration's View of the International Order– China's emphasis on United Nations diplomacy and liberal economic policies−" Shin Kawashima, Professor, the University of Tokyo
- November 2019, "The Future of China's Security Strategy" Hideshi Tokuchi, Senior Fellow, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies
- November 2019, "China --- Its Confidence and Anxiety" Bonji Ohara, Senior Research Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- August 2019: Several Perspectives on the Korean Peninsula Issue--- The Deteriorating Japan-South Korea Relationship and the Uncertain Denuclearization of North Korea --- By Masahiro Akiyama Chairman, the SSDP
- July 2019, "An Outlook on the Denuclearization of North Korea--- What is the Stance of North Korea?---", Junya Nishino, Professor, Keio University
- July 2019, "An Outlook on the Denuclearization of North Korea --- How will the US move?", Narushige Michishita, Vice President, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies
- July 2019, "Discussion on Denuclearization of North Korea", SSDP Discussion Meeting on May 8, 2019
- May 2019: "Current Status and Prospects of South Korea and Japan's Frictions over History: How to address the Judicial Problems", Masao Okonogi, Professor Emeritus, Keio University
- May 2019: "South Korea and Japan's Frictions over History" (Comments), Junya Nishino, Professor, Keio University
- May 2019: Japan and South Korea Relationships (Question & Answer)
- March 2019: "The Present State and Prospects of the Indian Economy and Economic Policies" written by Koji Kobayashi, Senior Economist Mizuho Research Institute Ltd.
- March 2019: "The "Modi diplomacy" in the History of Indian diplomacy--- Departure from or maintenance of the traditional diplomacy? ---" written by Toru Ito, The National Defense Academy of Japan
- February 2019: Dynamics of Indian Politics and the 2019 General Elections, written by Chiharu Takenaka, Professor of Rikkyo University
- February 2019: "Cooperative Strategy" to Realize "Competitive Strategy"--- The composite structure of Japan's "Free and Open Indo-Pacific" strategy (vision) ---, written by Matake Kamiya, Professor at The National Defense Academy of Japan
- January 2019:, A paper, "How will the US midterm elections results affect the Trump administration's foreign policy for 2019?" written by Tsuneo Watanabe, Senior Fellow, the Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- January 2019:, A paper, "The Present and Future of the International Trade Order" , written by Akihiko Tamura, Professor, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies
- December 2018: The US-China Competition and Japan, written by Ryo Sahashi, Professor at Kanagawa University
- December 2018: An Outlook for the US-China Trade War―What makes the two economically interdependent superpowers confront each other?―, written by Takashi Sekiyama, Associate professor at Toyo University
- September 2018: Proposal, "The Denuclearization of North Korea and the Restoration of Peace in the Korean Peninsula― Correct Perceptions and Eight Proposals on Japan's North Korea Diplomacy－" edited by the Society of Security and Diplomatic Policy Studies
- September 2018: "The Taiwan Policy of the Xi Jinping Administration in its Second Term: An Outlook on Cross-Strait Relations in the New Era" written by Yasuhiro Matsuda, Professor of the Tokyo University
- July 2018: "The EU States and Russia on North Korea Issues- Expansion of Influence through Diplomacy: Attempts and Limitations -" lectured by Yuichi Hosoya, Professor of Keio University
- "An Assessment of the US-North Korea Summit and an Outlook for the Future of the Korean Peninsula" lectured by Junya Nishino, Professor of Keio University
- "Korean Peninsula Issue and Japan's Future Security Policy" written by Hideshi Tokuchi, Senior Fellow of National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies
- July 2018: "US North Korea policy affected by personnel changes in the Trump administration" lectured by Tsuneo Watanabe, Senior Fellow of the Sasakawa Peace Foundation.
- "China-North Korea relationship under Xi Jinping" lectured by Shin Kawashima, Professor of the Tokyo University.
- "North Korean Denuclearization and Russia" lectured by Nobuo Shimotomai, Professor of the Hosei University.
- March 2018: "The Network Hegemony Theory for a Security Architecture in The Asia Pacific Region" lectured by Masahiro Akiyama, Chairman, the Society of Security and Diplomatic Policy Studies
- January 2018: "A Destabilized Middle East" lectured by Koichiro Tanaka, Professor, Keio University
- December 2017: "Problems in Sino-Japanese Relations, 1992-2042" lectured by Ezra F. Vogel, Professor of the Social Sciences Emeritus at Harvard University
- November 2017: "The Future of the Asia-Pacific Region" written by Yoriko Kawaguchi, Fellow, the Meiji Institute for Global Affairs, Former Minister Foreign Affairs
- October 2017: "A New Trend in India's Foreign Policy and Japan" Written by HIROSE,Takako, Professor, Senshu University
- August 2017: "The Shocks that shook the Transatlantic World and their Implication for Japan's Foreign Policy" written by HOSOYA, Yuichi, Professor, Keio University
- August 2017: "Does Economic Interdependence not Encourage Collaboration? ―Thinking Japan-China Relations from an Economic Perspective―" written by Takashi SEKIYAMA, Ph.D., Toyo University
- July 2017: Proposal article "The Trump Administration's Impact on the Cross-Strait Relations" written by Yasuhiro Matsuda, Ph.D.
- June 2017: Proposal article "The outlook for the relationship between two great powers and implications for Japanese diplomacy" written by Professor Shin Kawashima
- May 2017: (Emergency Proposal) Facing the Inconvenient Truth: Re-examining Policy for Peace and Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula (Chief author, Masao Okonogi)
- March 2017: "Economic Influences of the Trump Administration" written by Professor Motoshige Ito
- February, 2017: Proposal article "Trump's Foreign and Security Policy - Unpredictable President, Realistic Secretaries - " written by Mr. Tsuneo Watanabe is posted on the website of SSDP.
- December, 2016: Proposal article "Reconsidering North Korea Policy: How to Deal with a Nuclear Armed Divided States" written by Professor Masao Okonogi is posted on the website of SSDP.
- March 2021, Japan-ROK Parliamentary Dialogue -Japan-ROK Cooperation in the Era of US-China Competition- held on March 11, 2021
- December 2020: The report of the Japan-ROK Future Dialogue held on November 21 to discuss "Japan-ROK Cooperation in the Post-Covid-19 Era
- October 2020: "Responses to COVID-19 and Agendas for the Post-COVID-19 Era", A Brief Overview of the Japan-Korea Experts Dialogue held on July 29,30, 2020
- October 2020: "The China-Taiwan Confrontation over Corona Response and Taiwan's Security" written by Makoto Ogata, Former Chief of the Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association in Taipei
- May 2020: "Rivalries in the Middle East in New Security Dynamics", Written by Sayed Ghoneim, Major General (retired) of the Egyptian Armed Forces, Chairman, Institute for Global Security & Defence Affairs
- March 2020: The Japan-South Korea Relationship in a Cul-de-Sac--- Where is an Exit ? Masao Okonogi Professor Emeritus, Keio Universit
- December 2019: The Hong Kong Upheaval and the Future of Cross-Straits Relations－The 2019 Japan-Taiwan Strategic Dialogue Report OGATA, Makoto Former Chief of the Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association in Taipei
- August 2019: Report; 2019 FUTURE CONSENSUS DIALOGUE --Sustainable Prosperity and Future of Korea-U.S.-Japan Cooperation-- By Future Consensus Institute (Yeosijae)
- June 2019: Report on India – Japan Security Dialogue 2019 by Ms. Vindu Mai Chotani, Ph.D Student, The University of Tokyo
June 2019: Four papers on Japan-India Cooperation submitted to India-Japan Security Dialogue 2019
Japan's Rationale for a Free and Open Indo-Pacific Vision
Tsuneo Watanabe, Senior Fellow, The Sasakawa Peace Foundation
The Significance and Possibilities of India-Japan Cooperation in the Concept of the Indo-Pacific
Toru ITO Associate Professor, National Defense Academy of Japan
Japan-India Defense Cooperation in the Indo-Pacific Context - Operationalizing the Security Aspect of the Indo-Pacific Vision –
Hideshi Tokuchi, Senior Fellow, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS)
India-US-Japan Defense Cooperation: What's next?
Dr. Satoru Nagao, Hudson Institute
- Japan's Rationale for a Free and Open Indo-Pacific Vision
- November 2018: "The Present State of the Japanese Economy and Policy Issues" lectured by Motoshige Itoh, Professor Emeritus at the University of Tokyo.
- November 2018: "Expanding Social Security Expenses and Fiscal Reforms" lectured by Kazumasa Oguro, Professor at Hosei University.
- September 2018: "Taiwan Identity and Cross-Strait Relations and Trump's Taiwan Policy and the Future of Taiwan-US Relations-Discussion at The Second Japan-Taiwan Strategic Dialogue (June 21, 2018, Taipei)-" written by OGATA, Makoto
- September 2018: "Japan-Taiwan Dialogue 2018 Minutes", 21st June 2018, Taipei, Taiwan.
- July 2018: Report on The Second Japan – Philippines Strategic Dialogue prepared by Ms. Vindu Mai Chotani, Ph.D. Student, Graduate School of Public Policy, Tokyo University.
- May 2018: "Civilian Control "at Crisis"? – Perhaps Not, for the Case of the Field Sit-reps from SDF's South Sudan Mission" reported by Ippeita Nishida, Research Fellow, the Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- January 2018: "Fukushima, Genki？Project－Young Taiwanese volunteers introduce the facts on Fukushima's revival through documentary films－" reported by OGATA, Makoto, Former Chief of the Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association in Taipei
- December 2017: "Commemorating a Quarter Century of Dispatches of the JSDF's PKO Units: Challenges and Possibilities in the Post South Sudan" written by Takayuki Shoji, Lecturer, Nihon University
- November 2017: "19th CCP National Congress" written by Mr. Bonji Ohara, Senior Research Fellow, the Sasakawa Peace Fondation
- October 2017: "What is Japan's Role in the Indo-China border conflict?" written by Dr. NGAO,Satoru, Research Fellow, Institute for Future Engineering
- July 2017: "Overview of the Current Situation in Taiwan-" the Naturally Independent Generation" will affect the Taiwan"s politics-" written by Makoto Ogata MGE.(Ret.)
- June 2017: "Japan-U.S. Economic Dialogue" written by Mr.Takaaki Asano
- March 2017: "The Japan-Philippines Strategic Dialogue" written by Mr. Hideshi Tokuchi
- February, 2017: Current topic "The Importance of Japan's Security Role Under Trump" written by Dr. Satoru Nagao is posted on the SSDP website.
- December, 2016: Current topic "Widening Security Task: Will SDF do the Job?" written by Mr. Ippeita Nishida is posted on the SSDP website.
- December 2021, Research Jounal "Security Studies (vol 3 no 4)"-Korean Peninsula Situation- was published.
- September 2021, A research journal "Security Studies vol03 no03" -Asia's Security II- (English edition)
- June 2021, A research journal "Security Studies vol03 no02" -Asia's Security I- (English edition)
- March 2021: Research journal "Security Studies (vol3 no1) "- US Foreign Policy in the Biden Administration / The 2020 US Presidential Election and American Democracy -(English edition)
- December 2020: A research journal "Security Studies (vol2 no4) "- Normalize Japan-South Korea Relations trough Dialogues -(English edition)
- September 2020: A research journal "Security Studies (vol2 no3) "-The Novel Coronavirus and Security-(English edition)
- July 2020: A research journal "Security Studies (vol2 no2) - Middle East Situation and Japan's Security - " (English edition) was published
- May 2020: A research journal "Security Studies (vol2 no1) - Cyber, Space, Environment and Security - " March 2020 (English edition)
- February 2020, "A research journal "Security Studies (vol1 no4) " (English edition)"
- September 2019: A research journal "Security Studies (vol1 no3) " (English edition)
- August 2019: Korea-Japan Joint Seminar: FUTURE CONSENSUS DIALOGUE
- April 2019: "Security Studies (vol1 no2) April 2019"
- March 2019: A research journal "Security Studies vol1 no01" just published
- February 2019: The Denuclearization of North Korea and the Takeshima Issue
- December 2018: Former Vice Defense Minister Masahiro Akiyama's Memoirs (An Ad)
- November 2018: Participation in the Future Consensus Forum held in Beijing
- September 2018: "2018 Indo-Pacific Security Dialogue" reported by Masahiro Akiyama
- 2017 December: "The Butterfly Project-A possibility of showing a solution to the North Korea problem-"
- October 2017: Campaign on the problems with North Korea
- August 2017: A New Containment Policy Strategy
- June 2017: Korean peninsla
- March 2017: President Duterte
- February, 2017: Kazakhstan
- November, 2016: Participated in Astana Club 2016 held in Kazakhstan on November 14- 16, 2016.