Security in the Indian Ocean Region
Implication of the Galwan Incident for QUAD in the Indo-Pacific
Dr. Satoru Nagao
Fellow (Non-Resident), Hudson Institute
Does the Indian Ocean Region matter for Japan? Not a small number of Japanese think that the Indian Ocean Region is too far away. However, the Indian Ocean Region is rising as a Japanese security policy because the Indian Ocean Region is a key area for Japan's new security concepts such as the "Indo-Pacific" and the "QUAD." For example, the "Indo-Pacific" concept is used instead of "Asia-Pacific." The difference between "Indo-Pacific" and "Asia-Pacific" is the Indian Ocean Region. In the case of the "QUAD", the situation is similar. Because both Japan and Australia are formal allies of the US, Japan-US-Australia find it relatively easy to find opportunities to cooperate. However, India is a newcomer to the other three countries. The view from this situation is that the reason why Japan needs both "Indo-Pacific" and "QUAD" is because Japan needs to cooperate with countries in the Indian Ocean Region.
This article will examine what lessons Japan should learn for itself when it cooperates with the countries in the Indian Ocean Region, especially India. There are three questions to address to determine the lessons to be learned. Why does Japan need "Indo-Pacific" and the "QUAD"? What happened in the Indian Ocean Region? What are the implications of the Galwan valley incident? Answers to these questions will serve to indicate policy recommendations for Japan's "Indo-Pacific" and "QUAD" policy in the Indian Ocean Region.
1. Why does Japan need "Indo-Pacific" and "QUAD"?
For both "India-Pacific" and "QUAD", Japan was the pioneer in creating the concept of the Indo-Pacific and the QUAD's role in it. Former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's speech to the Indian parliament in 2007, entitled "Confluence of Two Seas," introduced the concept. He said, "By Japan and India coming together in this way, this ‘broader Asia' will evolve into an immense network spanning the entirety of the Pacific Ocean, incorporating the United States of America and Australia. Open and transparent, this network will allow people, goods, capital, and knowledge to flow freely." 1 Therefore, the key question for Japan's foreign policy is why did he need these concepts?
From his speech, one can see three reasons. First, he needed a way to link both the Pacific and the Indian Oceans. "Indo-Pacific" replaced the concept of the "Asia-Pacific," which did not include the Indian Ocean Region. Because of rapid economic development, both the Pacific and the Indian Ocean Regions are increasingly emerging as influential regions in world politics. In the past, Europe was the center of world politics. Therefore, when major wars broke out in Europe, the influence spread all over the world immediately. That was why the large wars in Europe were referred to as "World Wars ''. But now, not only Europe, but also the Indo-Pacific are rising in influence along with economical development. The International Institute for Strategic Studies in the UK pointed out that nominal Asian defense spending (excluding Australia and New Zealand) overtook that of NATO Europe in 2012. 2 Therefore, to explain current trends in world politics, Abe saw a need for new concepts that tied in all ascendant regions, including both the Pacific and the Indian Ocean Regions.
Second, Abe wanted to introduce both the Indo-Pacific and the QUAD at the same time because he knew that the rising Indo-Pacific should not be a China-dominated region. He explained his idea in his article, "Asia's Democratic Security Diamond," which was published in Europe just before he was sworn in as prime minister for a second time in 2012. 3 The Indo-Pacific is a concept that includes all countries around China. The QUAD includes all the great powers except China.
Thirdly, as mentioned above, he emphasized the idea because he wanted to highlight the importance of India. The "Indo-Pacific" is the concept instead of the "Asia-Pacific," which did not include India. In addition, the QUAD is a collaboration that includes India. Both Japan and Australia are US allies. There are plenty of opportunities to collaborate with each other. However, India is a newcomer. To cooperate with India, Japan needs the QUAD.
Therefore, Japan's "Indo-Pacific" and "QUAD" policy are dependent on the security in the Indian Ocean Region. And recently, in the Indian Ocean Region, India-China competition has been escalating.
2. What happened in the Indian Ocean Region?
(1) Expanding China's influence in the Indian Ocean Region (see Figure 1)
China has expanded its influence in the Indian Ocean Region since the 2000s. These moves have three facets such as infrastructure projects, the deployment of military forces and arms exports.
China has started infrastructure projects in the areas around India. Along with the Indo-China border, China has developed roads, tunnels, bridges, and trains in Tibet and Xinjiang Uygur Region. In Pakistan controlled Kashmir and Pakistan, China deployed military forces to build and secure strategic roads. China has also developed civil purpose ports in Gwadar in Pakistan, Hambantota in Sri Lanka, Chittagong in Bangladesh and Kyaukpyu in Myanmar. Because these infrastructure development projects lead to military deployments, these projects are a problem.
Since the end of 2000s, China's military deployment has escalated. In 2008, China dispatched naval warships for counter piracy measures to the coast of Somalia. After that China has deployed many naval ships under the name of "counter piracy measures." In 2017, fourteen Chinese naval warships deployed in the Indian Ocean and this was the largest naval deployment. According to Admiral Sunil Lanba, chief of the naval staff of the Indian Navy, Beijing has deployed 6-8 warships in the Indian Ocean. 4 Referring to China's ports development projects, some raise concerns that if the Chinese navy begins to use civil-purpose ports as naval supply bases, China could overcome its weakness, namely its lack of a naval port in the region. China also set up its first overseas naval base in Djibouti in 2017. According to the US AFRICOM commander, the pier of the Chinese naval base in Djibouti will be big enough to host their aircraft carrier soon. 5
China has been active in the continent side of the Indian Ocean Region. Since 2010, India confirmed that Chinese troops were building roads in Pakistani occupied Kashmir. After that, tens of thousands troops of Chinese armed forces and China's private military companies also deployed in Pakistan. On the Indo-China border, both ground and air forces have been active. The number of incursions in the Indo-China border reflected such a situation. In 2011, India recorded 213 incursions in the Indo-China border area, but in the following years, the numbers were larger: 426 in 2012, 411 in 2013, 460 in 2014, 428 in 2015, 296 in 2016, 473 in 2017, 404 in 2018. And in 2019, the number reached 663. Such activities lead to some crises like the Doklam crisis in 2017 and the Galwan incident 2020. Beijing has entered the Doklam heights, claimed by both China and Bhutan, insisting on building a new road to deploy more forces in 2017. This led to Indian and Chinese armed forces facing each other in a 75 days standoff along the 4,000 km Indo-China border (including the Line of Actual Control, a line separating the territory controlled by India from the territory controlled by China). In addition in 2020, 5,000 Chinese troops entered the Indian side of the border and clashed in the Galwan valley. At least twenty Indian soldiers died and 76 Indian soldiers were injured (details will be provided below). This incident has also continued the nearly ten months stand off of military forces.
Beijing has also been exporting weapons to countries around India and expanded its influence. Since the 1960s, China has exported many weapons to Pakistan. However, recently Beijing exported weapons to other countries around India. Submarines are especially notable. But Bangladesh received two in 2016, and Pakistan decided to import eight Chinese submarines for its navy in 2017.
The activities of these submarines indicate that they could potentially attack India's nuclear ballistic missile submarines, aircraft carriers, and sea lines of communication (SLOCs). These submarines also pose a threat for SLOCs of many other countries. The more China deploys its submarines, the more China can claim that China is "protecting" SLOCs of many countries in the Indian Ocean and expanding its influence, despite the US and India having been security providers in the Indian Ocean. This means that these submarines regulate India's influence in the Indian Ocean.
(2) India's counter measures (see Figure 2)
To tackle China's growing influence, India has also developed infrastructure, deployed military forces and exported weapons. In the Indo-China border and the Andaman Nicobar Islands, India has improved their infrastructure. India is also developing civil purpose ports in Agalega islands of Mauritius and upgrading a port in Sabang island in Indonesia. The Indian Navy also got rights to use Duqm port in Oman and Nha Trang port in Vietnam. Indian armed forces also deployed new fighter jets and cruise missiles at the front line of the Indo-China border area and coastal bases in the Indian Ocean. In addition, India also donated US$500 million for Bangladesh to buy spare parts for their fighter jets, 6 Kilo class submarines to Myanmar, and patrol ships to Sri Lanka and the Maldives. India also has been training pilots and crews of fighter jets and submarines from Vietnam and Malaysia. Fighter jets in Indonesia are also maintained by India. Singapore is using training facilities in India.
Compared with China, India's support is not well funded. However, China is alone but India is not. India can collaborate with many other countries. By using multilateral collaboration like "Look East Policy (later renamed "Act East Policy")", "Indo-Pacific", "QUAD", India tackled China's influence. Notably, India has received much military equipment from the US (such as C-17 heavy transport plane, C-130 middle size transport plane, AH-64 attack helicopter, CH-47 heavy transport helicopter, M777 ultra light howitzer, combat coats for harsh winter etc. India also plans to import unmanned aerial attack vehicles). The equipment gave India offensive-defense capability by attacking Chinese troops in Tibet. India also imported US equipment (such as P-8 anti-submarine patrol plane. India is planning to import unmanned aerial patrol planes and anti-submarine helicopters) from the US. The equipment gave India anti-submarine capability in the Indian Ocean. In the case of Japan, since 2014, Japan has invested in India's strategic road project in the northeast region of India. By using this road, the Indian army can deploy more forces and supplies to the border area.
3. What is the implication of the Galwan valley incident?
(1) The Galwan Incident and the military stand-off in the Indo-China border
The escalation of India-China competition in the Indian Ocean Region led to a lethal clash in June 2020, the so -called Galwan incident. The incident started when 5,000 Chinese troops invaded the Indian side of the Indo-China border. As 5,000 troops entered into the Indian side, the size of the operation was very big because these 5,000 troops needed logistical support and preparation. The incident appeared to be well planned.
In June 2020, despite both sides having agreed to withdraw, India and China clashed in Galwan valley in the process of withdrawing. However, Chinese troops ambushed Indian troops and 1,000 soldiers from both sides fought. 20 Indian soldiers sacrificed their lives and 76 Indian soldiers were injured (The Chinese side has not published any number of fatalities. In Feb 2021, China published a number but it was too small). 7
The number of fatalities caused by weapons. Chinese troops brought nail stubbed iron rods and killed Indian troops. On the Indo-China border, there is an agreement between the two sides that troops cannot use any firearms. This is the rule to avoid contingent conflict and to maintain peace. However, China exploited this rule and brought arms instead of firearms.
After the Galwan valley incident, both India and China have deployed far bigger military forces including tanks, boats, helicopters, fighter jets, and missiles. In August 2020, China deployed its latest weapons including DF-21 missiles, S-300 and S-400 surface to air missiles, H-6 strategic bomber with cruise missiles, J-11 fighter jets, J-16 fighter jets, J-20 fighter jets, Y-8J electric & surveillance plane, KJ-500 air early warning aircrafts, Ch-4 Unmanned aerial vehicle, Y-8 transport planes (for special force). This latest equipment was redeployed from other areas. And China also upgraded many air bases. A skirmish happened again. In September, because India had thought that China was planning to occupy another hill, India decided to occupy it before China reached the hill. Because Chinese troops also came to the hill, there was a possibility that a new clash would happen. To prevent the clash, the Indian side fired into the air as a warning. The clash was prevented but the shooting was a violation of agreement between the two sides. In addition, during the skirmish, one Indian-Tibetan soldier was killed from a land mine from the 1962 Indo-China war.The coffin was covered by both Indian and Tibetan flags and many Tibetans joined the funeral. In October, one Chinese soldier entered the Indian side and was arrested. The Indian side returned him to the Chinese side.
As a result, Indian External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar on Monday said the situation was "very serious" in October. 8 And US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo also raised alarm by pointing out that China has deployed 60,000 troops. 9
(2) India's counter measures
To tackle China's incursion and its military deployments, India has imposed many economic sanctions against China since April 2020. For example, in April, India set up a new rule to ensure a scrutiny of investments from companies based in neighboring countries. In June, India is considering imposing trade barriers and raising import duties on as many as 300 Chinese products. And in the same month, India banned 59 Chinese apps including TikTok. India added 47 more including Weibo and Baidu in July, 43 more in November. In July, the Indian government reviewed around 50 investment proposals involving Chinese companies under a new screening policy published in April. India also identified at least seven Chinese firms including Huawei, Alibaba, Tencent as companies connected to the People's Liberation Army.In the same month, nearly 370 categories of items such as toys, consumer electronics, glass, heavy machinery, rubber articles, paper, steel bars, steel tubes, and telecom items which are largely imported from China would be brought under the mandatory Indian Standards regime by March 2021. Chinese Ambassador to India Sun Weidong warned India that "Forced decoupling is against the trend and will only lead to a ‘lose-lose' outcome." 10
From September to October 2020 , India tested twelve missiles in 45 days. This was a very fast pace. And the missiles India tested included Hypersonic Technology Demonstrator Vehicles (HSTDV) which are not easy to intercepted by the current missile defense system, long range cruise missiles (BrahMos missiles, Shaurya missiles, and Nirbhay missiles), Prithvi II Ballistic Missiles, and Rudram anti-radar missile that destroy enemy radars before the main offensive operation. All of these missiles can be useful offensive capability against China. 11 Because China deployed the latest missiles and bombers, these tests showed India's retaliatory capability to deter China's missile attack.
In addition, the Indian government gave the Indian Army emergency powers to deal with complete freedom against any Chinese aggression. At the same time, the Indian government prepared an emergency budget to buy equipment, ammunition, fuel, food and building strategic infrastructure. And the US, France agreed to supply weapons to India. India, notably, got more than 60,000 combat coats from the US. This was very important equipment to work in the harsh winter season in the 5,000 m altitude Indo-China border. In addition, India invited the Australian Navy to the India-US-Japan trilateral Malabar Exercises 2020 to become "QUAD" exercises, decided to export BrahMos missiles to the Philippines, and attended the swearing-in ceremony of Taiwan President Tsai Ing-wen.
In February 2021, India and China agreed that Chinese troops would withdraw from Pangong Tso, which was one of the main areas China entered on the Indian side. That time, China deployed more than 200 main battle tanks in Pangong Tso and withdrew within two days. This move did ease the tensions and China's rapid move served as a warning sign to India because the rapid withdrawal capability was also a sign of rapid redeployment capability. 12 Chinese troops have still remained on the Indian side at four places on the Indo-China border. 13
Implication for Japan
Japan does not want the rising Pacific and the Indian Ocean Region to be a China dominated region. Therefore, "Indo-Pacific" and "QUAD" are needed. And in these concepts, the Indian Ocean Region is a new area and a key area for Japan. In the Indian Ocean Region, China has escalated its activities and Indian soldiers sacrificed their lives in the Galwan incident. Is there a lesson Japan should learn from this situation?
Indeed, the Galwan incident indicated that the Indo-China border is a key area for the QUAD. China believes the agreements among these four countries (Japan-India-US-Australia) as bilateral, trilateral, and quadrilateral (as "QUAD") are efforts at containment and therefore wants to stop them. To do so, which country would China choose to pressure? The most likely answer is India because China and India share a nearly 4,000 km land border (unlike Japan, US and Australia), allowing China to leverage its army. Moreover, China perceives that it can more easily persuade India to leave the US-led security framework because India and the US are not formal allies. Much like its behavior in the South China Sea, China is using its military to pressure India to drop foreign partnerships that might inhibit China. Therefore, there is a possibility that the more India cooperates with Japan-US-Australia bilateral bases, trilateral bases or "QUAD" bases, the more China will escalate its pressure toward India in the Indo-China border area. If so, the Galwan incident was one of the typical examples.
If "Indo-Pacific" and "QUAD" cooperation is key for Japan, Japan needs to support India in the Indo-China border area. For Japan, cooperation with India is important. For example, if India cooperates with Japan-US, India will not need to deal with all the Chinese fighter jets at the same time because China is likely to keep some of its fighter jets on their east side against Japan-US, and vice versa. If Japan's cooperation with India forces China's defense budget in a multi direction, it is easier for Japan to maintain military balance with China. Therefore, India joining as "QUAD" is interesting for Japan.
Therefore, Japan needs to persuade India to join the "QUAD". To persuade India, Japan needs to prove that the "QUAD" is beneficial for India even if India needs to take a risk on the Indo-China border. Japan needs to analyze the Indo-China border area and support India in a crisis. However, in Japan, there is a shortage of analysts on India As a result, analysis of the situation on the Indo-China border mainly relies on China experts and not on India experts. Japan must improve this.
The more China escalates its activities, the more Japan needs the "QUAD" in the "Indo-Pacific." The key issue is how to support India on the Indo-China border.
Figure1: China's activities in the Indian Ocean Region
Figure 2: India's activities in the Indian Ocean Region
- January 2022, "The 2022 South Korean Presidential Election and the Next Administration's Foreign and Security Policy" written by Junya Nishino, Professor, Keio University
- January 2022, "North Korea's Nuclear and Missile Development and Japan's Defense" written by Hideshi Tokuchi, Senior Fellow, GRIPS
- January 2022, "What will Become of Japan-South Korea Relations? The 1965 Japan-South Korea Treaty System in Jeopardy" written by Masao Okonogi, Professor Emeritus, Keio University
- December 2021, "Economic and Social Conditions in North Korea and its Relations with South Korea" written by Mitsuhiro Mimura, Chief Research Fellow, The Economic Research Institute for Northeast Asia.
- December 2021, "China's Korean Peninsula Policy and North Korea" written by Shin Kawashima, Professor, the University of Tokyo.
- December 2021, "China's Korean Peninsula Policy and North Korea" written by Shunji Hiraiwa, Professor, Nanzan University.
- December 2021, "What to Do with the Relations with North Korea?" written by Hitoshi Tanaka, Chairman for Institute for International Strategy at the Japan Research Institute.
- October 2021, "Strategic Implications of North Korea's Enhanced Nuclear and Missile Capabilities" written by Narushige Michishita, Vice President, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
- October 2021, "The Biden Administration's North Korea Policy: Its Low Priority and Looming Crises" written by Tsuneo Watanabe, Senior Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation.
- October 2021, "The Evolution of the US-ROK Alliance: Tasks in the Biden Era" written by Yasuyo Sakata, Professor, Kanda University of International Studies.
- September 2021, "The Development of Regional Security Architecture: From Asia-Pacific to Indo-Pacific" written by Ken Jimbo, Professor, Keio University.
- September 2021, "The Strategic Development of Japanese Security Cooperation under Superpower Competition and the Development of the FOIP and its Operationalization" written by Nobushige Takamizawa, Visiting Professor, Graduate School of Public Policy, The University of Tokyo.
- August 2021, "Security Perceptions of Central Asian Countries--- From the Perspective of China Studies ---" written by Shin Kawashima, Professor, the University of Tokyo.
- August 2021, "Security in the Indian Ocean Region---Implication of the Galwan Incident for QUAD in the Indo-Pacific" written by Dr. Satoru Nagao, Fellow (Non-Resident), Hudson Institute.
- August 2021, "Easternization and Security in Asia" written by Tsuneo Watanabe, Senior Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation.
- July 2021, "The Ideas of "Autonomy" and "Self-Reliance" in Contemporary India's Foreign Strategy" written by Kazutoshi TAMARI, Associate Professor,Chukyo University.
- July 2021, "Thailand's Security Policies and Threat Perceptions" written by Saya Kiba, Associate Professor, Komatsu University, Faculty of Intercultural Communication.
- July 2021, "Myanmar's Security Perceptions and the February 1 Coup d'Etat" written by Yoshihiro Nakanishi, Associate Professor, Kyoto University.
- July 2021, "Australia's Security Perceptions and the "Asia Threat"" written byTomohiko Satake, Senior Fellow, Defense Policy Division, Policy Studies Department, NIDS .
- June 2021, "The Indo-Pacific Regional Architecture: Its Future--- Multipolar Order Beyond US-China Relations ---" by Tsutomu Kikuchi, Professor, Aoyama Gakuin University
- June 2021, "The Quad Plus in the Security of Asia: Its Significance and Outlook" by Hideshi Tokuchi, Senior Fellow, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies
- June 2021, "Indonesian Views and Perceptions on National Security" by Nobuhiro Aizawa, Associate Professor, The Graduate School of Social and Cultural Studies, Kyushu University
- June 2021, "Normalized Tensions in the Cross-Strait Relations--- Structural Changes in Taiwanese Society and the Xi Jinping Administration's Strategic Shift ---" by Yasuhiro Matsuda, Professor, The University of Tokyo
- June 2021, "China's Maritime Strategy and Responses of the United States and Japan" by Yoji Koda, Former Commander in Chief, Self Defense Fleet
- June 2021, "The South China Issues from the Perspective of the International Law Order",by Shigeki Sakamoto, Emeritus Professor, Kobe University
- May 2021, "Indonesian Views and Perceptions on National Security" by Nobuhiro Aizawa, Associate Professor, Kyushu University
- May, 2021, "The Philippine Foreign and Security Policy Perspective" written by Yusuke Takagi Associate Professor,National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
- May, 2021, "Vietnam's Security: Challenges and Responses" written by Tomotaka Shoji Head, Asia and Africa Division, Regional Studies Department, National Institute for Defense Studies
- March, 2021, "Can the Biden Administration Restore America as a Global Leader?" written by Matake Kamiya, Professor, the National Defense Academy of Japan.
- March, 2021, "The Biden Administration and Japan's Security Strategy" written by Hideshi Tokuchi, Senior Fellow, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
- February,2021, "US Foreign and Security Policy Direction Viewed from the Biden Administration's Lineup" written by Tsuneo Watanabe, Senior Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- February,2021, "Trade Policies of the Biden Administration" written by Takaaki Asano, Senior Analyst, Sumitomo Corporation Global Research Co. Ltd.
- February,2021, "The Biden Administration's Policy toward Russia" written by Taisuke Abiru, Senior Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- January,2021, "Will US Policy Toward China Change?" lectured by Ryo Sahashi, Associate Professor, the University of Tokyo
- January,2021, "How will China View the Biden Administration?" written by Bonji Ohara, Senior Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- January,2021, "An Assessment of the 2020 US Presidential Election－American Democracy Now－" lectured by Fumiaki Kubo, Professor, the University of Tokyo
- January,2021, "Two Trumpian Mysteries－Why did Trump win over 70 million votes? Why is his outrageous behavior unchecked?－" lectured by Kazuhiro Maeshima, Professor, Sophia University
- September, 2020, "The Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic and Internationa Relationsl" by Matake Kamiya, Professor, National Defense Academy of Japan
- September, 2020, "The Policy Agenda for the Xi Jinping Administration- COVID-19 Countermeasures and China's International Relations -" by Shin Kawashima, Professor, The University of Tokyo
- "Control in the United States and International Relations" by Koji Murata, Professor, Doshisha University
- September, 2020, "The EU's Response to COVID-19 and International Relations" by Yuichi Hosoya, Professor, Keio University
- August, 2020, "The Corona Crisis Seen from a Macroeconomic Perspective" written by Motoshige Itoh, Professor Emeritus, The University of Tokyo
- August, 2020, "The Coronavirus Pandemic and Japan's Infectious Disease Control" written by Takashi Mihara, Senior Research Fellow, NLI Research Institute
- August, 2020, "Infectious Disease Crisis Control in Japan- Recommendations on an Exit Strategy -" written by Kazumasa Oguro, Professor, Hosei University
- August, 2020, "Security against Infectious Disease Threats --- Policy Responses Abroad" written by Takashi Sekiyama, Associate Professor, Kyoto University
- June 2020,"Transformation of the International Order in the Middle East--- Varying Degrees of "Stateness" and Three Directions of the New Order" written by Satoshi Ikeuchi, Professor, Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo
- June 2020,"Destabilization in the Middle East and its Impacts on Japan's Energy Security" written by Amane Kobayashi, Research Fellow, The Institute of Energy Economics
- May 2020: Urgent Recommendations "Toward a V-shaped Recovery after the Novel Coronavirus Pandemic "Coronavirus Testing for All" --- the First Step of the Next Phase"
- May 2020: "US Diplomacy toward Iran: Economic Sanctions as a Diplomatic Tool" Hiroki Sugita Columnist, Kyodo News
- "Russian Factors in the Middle East" Taisuke Abiru Senior Research Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- "The SDF Dispatches to the Middle East --- History and Significance" Ippeita Nishida Senior Research Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- March 2020, "Space and Security" Kazuto Suzuki Professor, Hokkaido University
- March 2020, "The US Security Space Policy --- With a Focus on the Establishment of Two Space Forces" Yasuhito Fukushima Chief Researcher, The National Institute for Defense Studies
- March 2020, "China's Recent Activities in Space and Cyberspace" Bonji Ohara Senior Research Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- March 2020, "Environmental Security and Japan" Takashi Sekiyama Associate Professor, Kyoto University
- March 2020, "Changes in Global Environment and Security --- US Security Strategy" Hideshi Tokuchi Senior Fellow, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS)
- February 2020, "Cyberspace Security" Motohiro Tsuchiya Professor, Keio University
- February 2020, "Japan's Space and Cyberspace Policy" Yukinari Hirose Former President of the National Institute for Defense Studies
- December 2019, "The US-China Confrontation --- Where Will Hegemony Reside Next?" Akio Takahara Professor, the University of Tokyo
- December 2019, "Challenges Facing the Chinese Economy" Osamu Tanaka Chief Senior Researcher, Institute of Developing Economies, JETRO
- December 2019, "US Strategic Perception on China: Implications for US Allied Partners" Tsuneo Watanabe Senior Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- November 2019, "The Xi Jinping Administration's View of the International Order– China's emphasis on United Nations diplomacy and liberal economic policies−" Shin Kawashima, Professor, the University of Tokyo
- November 2019, "The Future of China's Security Strategy" Hideshi Tokuchi, Senior Fellow, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies
- November 2019, "China --- Its Confidence and Anxiety" Bonji Ohara, Senior Research Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- August 2019: Several Perspectives on the Korean Peninsula Issue--- The Deteriorating Japan-South Korea Relationship and the Uncertain Denuclearization of North Korea --- By Masahiro Akiyama Chairman, the SSDP
- July 2019, "An Outlook on the Denuclearization of North Korea--- What is the Stance of North Korea?---", Junya Nishino, Professor, Keio University
- July 2019, "An Outlook on the Denuclearization of North Korea --- How will the US move?", Narushige Michishita, Vice President, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies
- July 2019, "Discussion on Denuclearization of North Korea", SSDP Discussion Meeting on May 8, 2019
- May 2019: "Current Status and Prospects of South Korea and Japan's Frictions over History: How to address the Judicial Problems", Masao Okonogi, Professor Emeritus, Keio University
- May 2019: "South Korea and Japan's Frictions over History" (Comments), Junya Nishino, Professor, Keio University
- May 2019: Japan and South Korea Relationships (Question & Answer)
- March 2019: "The Present State and Prospects of the Indian Economy and Economic Policies" written by Koji Kobayashi, Senior Economist Mizuho Research Institute Ltd.
- March 2019: "The "Modi diplomacy" in the History of Indian diplomacy--- Departure from or maintenance of the traditional diplomacy? ---" written by Toru Ito, The National Defense Academy of Japan
- February 2019: Dynamics of Indian Politics and the 2019 General Elections, written by Chiharu Takenaka, Professor of Rikkyo University
- February 2019: "Cooperative Strategy" to Realize "Competitive Strategy"--- The composite structure of Japan's "Free and Open Indo-Pacific" strategy (vision) ---, written by Matake Kamiya, Professor at The National Defense Academy of Japan
- January 2019:, A paper, "How will the US midterm elections results affect the Trump administration's foreign policy for 2019?" written by Tsuneo Watanabe, Senior Fellow, the Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- January 2019:, A paper, "The Present and Future of the International Trade Order" , written by Akihiko Tamura, Professor, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies
- December 2018: The US-China Competition and Japan, written by Ryo Sahashi, Professor at Kanagawa University
- December 2018: An Outlook for the US-China Trade War―What makes the two economically interdependent superpowers confront each other?―, written by Takashi Sekiyama, Associate professor at Toyo University
- September 2018: Proposal, "The Denuclearization of North Korea and the Restoration of Peace in the Korean Peninsula― Correct Perceptions and Eight Proposals on Japan's North Korea Diplomacy－" edited by the Society of Security and Diplomatic Policy Studies
- September 2018: "The Taiwan Policy of the Xi Jinping Administration in its Second Term: An Outlook on Cross-Strait Relations in the New Era" written by Yasuhiro Matsuda, Professor of the Tokyo University
- July 2018: "The EU States and Russia on North Korea Issues- Expansion of Influence through Diplomacy: Attempts and Limitations -" lectured by Yuichi Hosoya, Professor of Keio University
- "An Assessment of the US-North Korea Summit and an Outlook for the Future of the Korean Peninsula" lectured by Junya Nishino, Professor of Keio University
- "Korean Peninsula Issue and Japan's Future Security Policy" written by Hideshi Tokuchi, Senior Fellow of National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies
- July 2018: "US North Korea policy affected by personnel changes in the Trump administration" lectured by Tsuneo Watanabe, Senior Fellow of the Sasakawa Peace Foundation.
- "China-North Korea relationship under Xi Jinping" lectured by Shin Kawashima, Professor of the Tokyo University.
- "North Korean Denuclearization and Russia" lectured by Nobuo Shimotomai, Professor of the Hosei University.
- March 2018: "The Network Hegemony Theory for a Security Architecture in The Asia Pacific Region" lectured by Masahiro Akiyama, Chairman, the Society of Security and Diplomatic Policy Studies
- January 2018: "A Destabilized Middle East" lectured by Koichiro Tanaka, Professor, Keio University
- December 2017: "Problems in Sino-Japanese Relations, 1992-2042" lectured by Ezra F. Vogel, Professor of the Social Sciences Emeritus at Harvard University
- November 2017: "The Future of the Asia-Pacific Region" written by Yoriko Kawaguchi, Fellow, the Meiji Institute for Global Affairs, Former Minister Foreign Affairs
- October 2017: "A New Trend in India's Foreign Policy and Japan" Written by HIROSE,Takako, Professor, Senshu University
- August 2017: "The Shocks that shook the Transatlantic World and their Implication for Japan's Foreign Policy" written by HOSOYA, Yuichi, Professor, Keio University
- August 2017: "Does Economic Interdependence not Encourage Collaboration? ―Thinking Japan-China Relations from an Economic Perspective―" written by Takashi SEKIYAMA, Ph.D., Toyo University
- July 2017: Proposal article "The Trump Administration's Impact on the Cross-Strait Relations" written by Yasuhiro Matsuda, Ph.D.
- June 2017: Proposal article "The outlook for the relationship between two great powers and implications for Japanese diplomacy" written by Professor Shin Kawashima
- May 2017: (Emergency Proposal) Facing the Inconvenient Truth: Re-examining Policy for Peace and Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula (Chief author, Masao Okonogi)
- March 2017: "Economic Influences of the Trump Administration" written by Professor Motoshige Ito
- February, 2017: Proposal article "Trump's Foreign and Security Policy - Unpredictable President, Realistic Secretaries - " written by Mr. Tsuneo Watanabe is posted on the website of SSDP.
- December, 2016: Proposal article "Reconsidering North Korea Policy: How to Deal with a Nuclear Armed Divided States" written by Professor Masao Okonogi is posted on the website of SSDP.
- March 2021, Japan-ROK Parliamentary Dialogue -Japan-ROK Cooperation in the Era of US-China Competition- held on March 11, 2021
- December 2020: The report of the Japan-ROK Future Dialogue held on November 21 to discuss "Japan-ROK Cooperation in the Post-Covid-19 Era
- October 2020: "Responses to COVID-19 and Agendas for the Post-COVID-19 Era", A Brief Overview of the Japan-Korea Experts Dialogue held on July 29,30, 2020
- October 2020: "The China-Taiwan Confrontation over Corona Response and Taiwan's Security" written by Makoto Ogata, Former Chief of the Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association in Taipei
- May 2020: "Rivalries in the Middle East in New Security Dynamics", Written by Sayed Ghoneim, Major General (retired) of the Egyptian Armed Forces, Chairman, Institute for Global Security & Defence Affairs
- March 2020: The Japan-South Korea Relationship in a Cul-de-Sac--- Where is an Exit ? Masao Okonogi Professor Emeritus, Keio Universit
- December 2019: The Hong Kong Upheaval and the Future of Cross-Straits Relations－The 2019 Japan-Taiwan Strategic Dialogue Report OGATA, Makoto Former Chief of the Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association in Taipei
- August 2019: Report; 2019 FUTURE CONSENSUS DIALOGUE --Sustainable Prosperity and Future of Korea-U.S.-Japan Cooperation-- By Future Consensus Institute (Yeosijae)
- June 2019: Report on India – Japan Security Dialogue 2019 by Ms. Vindu Mai Chotani, Ph.D Student, The University of Tokyo
June 2019: Four papers on Japan-India Cooperation submitted to India-Japan Security Dialogue 2019
Japan's Rationale for a Free and Open Indo-Pacific Vision
Tsuneo Watanabe, Senior Fellow, The Sasakawa Peace Foundation
The Significance and Possibilities of India-Japan Cooperation in the Concept of the Indo-Pacific
Toru ITO Associate Professor, National Defense Academy of Japan
Japan-India Defense Cooperation in the Indo-Pacific Context - Operationalizing the Security Aspect of the Indo-Pacific Vision –
Hideshi Tokuchi, Senior Fellow, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS)
India-US-Japan Defense Cooperation: What's next?
Dr. Satoru Nagao, Hudson Institute
- Japan's Rationale for a Free and Open Indo-Pacific Vision
- November 2018: "The Present State of the Japanese Economy and Policy Issues" lectured by Motoshige Itoh, Professor Emeritus at the University of Tokyo.
- November 2018: "Expanding Social Security Expenses and Fiscal Reforms" lectured by Kazumasa Oguro, Professor at Hosei University.
- September 2018: "Taiwan Identity and Cross-Strait Relations and Trump's Taiwan Policy and the Future of Taiwan-US Relations-Discussion at The Second Japan-Taiwan Strategic Dialogue (June 21, 2018, Taipei)-" written by OGATA, Makoto
- September 2018: "Japan-Taiwan Dialogue 2018 Minutes", 21st June 2018, Taipei, Taiwan.
- July 2018: Report on The Second Japan – Philippines Strategic Dialogue prepared by Ms. Vindu Mai Chotani, Ph.D. Student, Graduate School of Public Policy, Tokyo University.
- May 2018: "Civilian Control "at Crisis"? – Perhaps Not, for the Case of the Field Sit-reps from SDF's South Sudan Mission" reported by Ippeita Nishida, Research Fellow, the Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- January 2018: "Fukushima, Genki？Project－Young Taiwanese volunteers introduce the facts on Fukushima's revival through documentary films－" reported by OGATA, Makoto, Former Chief of the Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association in Taipei
- December 2017: "Commemorating a Quarter Century of Dispatches of the JSDF's PKO Units: Challenges and Possibilities in the Post South Sudan" written by Takayuki Shoji, Lecturer, Nihon University
- November 2017: "19th CCP National Congress" written by Mr. Bonji Ohara, Senior Research Fellow, the Sasakawa Peace Fondation
- October 2017: "What is Japan's Role in the Indo-China border conflict?" written by Dr. NGAO,Satoru, Research Fellow, Institute for Future Engineering
- July 2017: "Overview of the Current Situation in Taiwan-" the Naturally Independent Generation" will affect the Taiwan"s politics-" written by Makoto Ogata MGE.(Ret.)
- June 2017: "Japan-U.S. Economic Dialogue" written by Mr.Takaaki Asano
- March 2017: "The Japan-Philippines Strategic Dialogue" written by Mr. Hideshi Tokuchi
- February, 2017: Current topic "The Importance of Japan's Security Role Under Trump" written by Dr. Satoru Nagao is posted on the SSDP website.
- December, 2016: Current topic "Widening Security Task: Will SDF do the Job?" written by Mr. Ippeita Nishida is posted on the SSDP website.
- December 2021, Research Jounal "Security Studies (vol 3 no 4)"-Korean Peninsula Situation- was published.
- September 2021, A research journal "Security Studies vol03 no03" -Asia's Security II- (English edition)
- June 2021, A research journal "Security Studies vol03 no02" -Asia's Security I- (English edition)
- March 2021: Research journal "Security Studies (vol3 no1) "- US Foreign Policy in the Biden Administration / The 2020 US Presidential Election and American Democracy -(English edition)
- December 2020: A research journal "Security Studies (vol2 no4) "- Normalize Japan-South Korea Relations trough Dialogues -(English edition)
- September 2020: A research journal "Security Studies (vol2 no3) "-The Novel Coronavirus and Security-(English edition)
- July 2020: A research journal "Security Studies (vol2 no2) - Middle East Situation and Japan's Security - " (English edition) was published
- May 2020: A research journal "Security Studies (vol2 no1) - Cyber, Space, Environment and Security - " March 2020 (English edition)
- February 2020, "A research journal "Security Studies (vol1 no4) " (English edition)"
- September 2019: A research journal "Security Studies (vol1 no3) " (English edition)
- August 2019: Korea-Japan Joint Seminar: FUTURE CONSENSUS DIALOGUE
- April 2019: "Security Studies (vol1 no2) April 2019"
- March 2019: A research journal "Security Studies vol1 no01" just published
- February 2019: The Denuclearization of North Korea and the Takeshima Issue
- December 2018: Former Vice Defense Minister Masahiro Akiyama's Memoirs (An Ad)
- November 2018: Participation in the Future Consensus Forum held in Beijing
- September 2018: "2018 Indo-Pacific Security Dialogue" reported by Masahiro Akiyama
- 2017 December: "The Butterfly Project-A possibility of showing a solution to the North Korea problem-"
- October 2017: Campaign on the problems with North Korea
- August 2017: A New Containment Policy Strategy
- June 2017: Korean peninsla
- March 2017: President Duterte
- February, 2017: Kazakhstan
- November, 2016: Participated in Astana Club 2016 held in Kazakhstan on November 14- 16, 2016.