Two Trumpian Mysteries
－Why did Trump win over 70 million votes?
Why is his outrageous behavior unchecked?－1
(A lecture at the 29th SSDP discussion session on December 10, 2020)
Professor, Sophia University
1. A "Sensationally" Close Contest
This time, I am asked to speak on a very intriguing topic, "Two Trumpian Mysteries --- Why did Trump win over 70 million votes? Why is his outrageous behavior unchecked?" Some keywords --- "sensational," "predictable," "inevitable," etc. --- would help me to solve these mysteries.
Things like the Trump phenomenon were not exceptional in American history. The recent presidential election was in the first place a "sensationally" close contest. The enormous number of votes was also "sensational." Looking from a longer perspective, the Trump phenomenon and the resulting political polarization has been taking place. President Trump's language is deteriorating in quality. Yet, it is not an "outrage," but rather a political performance that calculates audience reaction. Is the Trump phenomenon "alien" to American soil? Not at all. In American history, small voices criticizing the distortions of society occasionally grow into a large swell and come forth on the stage of politics.
The 2020 presidential election ended with the same number of electoral votes as 2016 (Clinton vs. Trump) --- 306 to 232 with a 74-vote margin. NHK reported Biden's overwhelming victory, but that is not the case. The recent presidential election was a close contest. Nationwide, Biden won a historic 80 million votes, but Trump also won 74 million; the percentages of votes were 51% favoring Biden and 47.8% for Trump.
As for the elections of electors, the battle was much closer in the five states of Pennsylvania (with a voting difference of 1.18%), Michigan (2.78%), Georgia (0.26%), Wisconsin (0.63%), and Arizona (0.31%). These are the states that Trump won in 2016, and Biden has won them back this time acquiring 73 electoral votes. President Trump was absent from the campaign trail for ten days due to corona infection; if he had not contracted the disease, he would have more actively canvassed for votes, and the gap would have narrowed. Taking off his mask, Trump made those enthusiastic speeches, while Biden, respecting social distancing, disseminated his messages online. Republicans repeated door-to-door visits to their supporters. Democrats did not. These differences had a significant impact on the election results.
The congressional elections were also very close. In the House of Representatives, Democrats maintained the majority but lost more than ten seats. Republicans will likely dominate the majority in the Senate, albeit by a small margin. It was anticipated that the reelection of many congressional seats might adversely affect Republicans, but the result is that they will surpass the majority threshold. Republicans fought well in the congressional elections despite the defeat of President Trump.
2. Over 70 Million Votes --- A "Predictable" Result
Trump's winning over 70 million votes should be construed as "predictable" rather than "mysterious." He spent these four years rewarding Republican supporters and consolidating their support for himself. Trump is the first American president who tried to explore support in such a straightforward and, in a sense, "practical" manner. Four years ago, people said, "Is he a true conservative? He does not belong to the mainstream of the Republican Party." But for the last four years, Trump has aimed for the Republican mainstream and become its leader.
Mainstream Republicans comprise "small government" promoters and religious conservatives. President Trump holds fast to "small government," implementing sweeping tax-cuts and deregulation. Republican supporters look upon US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement as deregulation. President Trump argued that the Paris Agreement is a Chinese machination to devastate the US manufacturing industry. He withdrew the United States from the Agreement, calling the withdrawal "deregulation." By many accounts, President Trump is not really a religious conservative; he has never completely read the Bible. But before the Republican convention in summer 2016, he nominated Mike Pence as a vice presidential candidate, whom many agree to be the most enthusiastic evangelical congressman. Besides the appointment of three Supreme Court judges after his inauguration, President Trump appointed many conservative judges for high courts and district courts, following a list prepared by a conservative legal association called the Federalist Society. He recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and moved the US embassy to that city to fulfill evangelicals' wishes. He laid siege to Iran hostile to Israel and went so far as abandoning the Iran nuclear agreement and killing Commander Soleimani to benefit religious conservatives.
In addition to these two groups --- religious conservatives and evangelicals ---, the white blue-collar workers, although not large in number, are becoming one of the mainstream Republican groups following the Tea Party movement. Trump won the 2016 presidential election by building support among white blue-collar workers in Rust Belt states. He is pushing forward with a trade war with China, also for the benefit of these white people. Policy measures such as the review of NAFTA, the US-Japan trade agreement, and the US withdrawal from the TPP were all implemented for the same purpose. By the end of his term of office, President Trump will also have implemented immigration bans on Muslim countries as part of his efforts to restrict immigration from countries capable of exporting terrorism and a partial US military withdrawal from Syria and Afghanistan.
In short, the Trump phenomenon has centered on benefitting its supporters; it is, therefore, "predictable" that support for President Trump is rock solid. I think Biden's diplomacy will head in a diametrically opposite direction from Trump's. Nonetheless, Biden's America will take an inward-looking diplomatic stance as a continuation of Trump diplomacy; the United States will "no longer be the world's policeman."
According to a Gallup survey just before the 2020 presidential election, President Trump's approval rating was 46%, which is low compared to his predecessors. But 95% of Republicans and 3% of Democrats supported him; the difference is 92 points --- the largest margin since his inauguration.
President Trump failed to address the COVID-19 crisis. He seems to have thought that COVID-19 is a problem for cities on the west and east coasts (Blue states/areas) and that the anti-racism movement is also a problem peculiar to large cities. President Trump believed it to be correct to reopen the economy for his supporters. He thought it right to deal with the anti-racism movement by using "law and order" because the latter is "rational."
280,000 Americans have so far perished by COVID-19, and 15 million have contracted the virus. The Civil War, the deadliest warfare in American history, killed about 800,000 civilians. A little less than 400,000 Americans perished in World War II. The number of COVID-19 victims is now approaching that of American WWII victims.
The United States is now in a situation where there is no substantial policy discussion; the divisive question of mask-wearing hindered COVID-19 countermeasures from being properly discussed. Political polarization has progressed to such an extent as to make impossible performance evaluation voting for the Trump administration. Conciliation among people has become difficult. The current political situation is deviating far from mandates entrusted by the people. Concerns are mounting about possible conflicts and intensifying tensions among the people toward the 2022 midterm elections.
3. Trump Phenomenon is "Inevitable" --- Political Polarization
It is quite "natural" for President Trump to have received enthusiastic support because his policy measures benefited his supporters. Looking, on the other hand, from a little longer perspective --- longer than the recent four years ---, we will understand the "inevitability" of the Trump phenomenon.
Not only have the conservative and liberal camps alienated each other, but political polarization has gradually progressed over the last 40 years, where unity and ideological cohesion within each camp have increasingly intensified. For example, the difference between Republican and Democrats' approval ratings for President Trump is about 80-90 points. Meanwhile, the difference between Democrats' and Republican approval ratings for President Obama was 50-70. Again, the difference between the two parties' approval ratings for President Clinton was about 30 points. The disparity has widened for the last 20-30 years.
In terms of political party support, the conservatives are becoming more and more supportive of the Republican Party, while the liberals are becoming more and more monolithically united in support of the Democratic Party. For the last few years, a symmetric equilibrium has existed between the two camps. Polarization and divide and rule politics (a twisted relationship between President and Congress) impede politics and increase political distrust. Such a situation raised expectations for the Tea Party movement, Occupy Wall Street, and outsiders. Then there was the Bernie Sanders phenomenon and the appearance of Trump followed.
Why has the current political polarization occurred? Slow but steady changes over the last 50 years have now reached a culmination point. Few decades in American history witnessed such events in succession as the civil rights movement in the 1960s, the Democratic Party's involvement in the civil rights movement, and the women's liberation movement following the Roe v. Wade Supreme Court ruling in 1973 (which legalized abortion across the country). And in the 1970s, the southern states gradually became Republican, and in the 1980s, evangelicals emerged as a political force. In the last 40 or 50 years, southern democrats decreased on the one hand while the liberal Rockefeller Republicans in the East Coast headed for disappearance on the other hand.
Also, in the last 30 or 40 years, the American election industry flourished. It is quite a simple business; it exhaustively asserts, "We are right; you (the opponent) are bad." Furthermore, the so-called "Gingrich Whirlwind" also helped to intensify congressional confrontation. In the 1994 elections, the Republican Party won a congressional majority, which was their long-cherished wish. Gingrich, who contributed to that feat, became Speaker of the House from the following year and consistently encouraged partisan conflict. As a result, the congressional confrontation became fierce. In the 1970s, half of Republicans and half of Democrats jointly pushed various bills to the then President --- which accounted for many environment-related bills passed under the Nixon administration. At present, 90% of senators and representatives unite if not bound by party discipline --- which is mostly related to the fact that at the time of the gerrymandering of congressional districts once every ten years, what matters is which party dominates which state; the partisanship has become more purified.
Meanwhile, the environment surrounding American voters has significantly changed. As the Internet went widespread from the latter half of the 1990s, a new phenomenon called "filter bubble" appeared. The Internet filter allows the user access only to pieces of information of his liking while rejecting his access to other information that does not suit him. President Trump dismisses information he does not accept as "fake news." The environment that nurtures such thinking is becoming ubiquitous.
Reviewing the trend in the past 30 years, I would like to conclude that the Trump phenomenon is "inevitable."
4. Outrageous Behavior Calculated to Look Like Natural
President Trump speaks an ungentlemanly language that sounds outrageous. But it is calculated to sound "natural," although it sounds obnoxious. In a sense, he resembles the Japanese Internet tycoon Takafumi Horie (nicknamed Horiemon) in expression. In the 1980s, when he first attracted media focus, Trump was a sensible speaker with a rich vocabulary. Now he has picked up a strategy of delivering an easy-to-understand message to his supporters by using "naturally" simple coarse words.
President Trump is responsible for the current omnipresence of fake news in American society. He declares any news inconvenient to him to be fake. It is also his strategy.
Another strategy of his is to have allowed no expert in his administration. Before the Trump administration started, Republican think tanks had declared that they would never join it. Trump answered by unfolding criticism of the deep state (shadow government), saying, "These members of the Establishment prioritize their own interests and make society worse." Experts have had no access to the administration. President Trump nominated Rex Tillerson for Secretary of State and Michael Flynn for National Security Advisor, but eventually dismissed those non-mainstreamers. His direction of the dizzying political drama was as "natural" as his direction of a television variety program he once hosted. All who remained were a handful of people like Peter Navarro.
The speed at which information is released is also significant. In the social media world, quick response is crucial; it may be a demagogue or a populist that responds actively using social media. To put it positively, President Trump is responsive, as far as he is positioning his policy while paying attention to public opinion.
President Trump's strategy of distinguishing "enemies from allies" always targets the media dealing harshly with him. When asked if they trust the media, 73% of Democrat supporters answered in the affirmative, but only 10% of Republican supporters trust it. It seems that President Trump believes that the more he attacks the media, the more he will receive support as long as his supporters do not trust the media.
5. Is the Trump Phenomenon Alien? --- "Not at All"
I think that the Trump phenomenon is "not" alien "at all." When considering US diplomacy, the decades from the post-WWII period through the present time may be distinctive in American history. There is much mention of "the active role of the United States in the international community" or "the decline of American leadership." But it is the period from the end of WWII to the mid-1960s that the United States assumed world leadership. Although the term "international liberal order" is of recent origin, the original concept became popular in the United States after World War II. How many Americans know this fact? Today, skepticism about free trade, anti-TPP feelings, etc., are shared by both the Democratic and Republican sides.
Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders are alike in that they must have been destined to disappear like the former third parties. The third parties are the "agents of reform" that have frequently appeared in American political history. They disappear after having attempted some temporary reforms. Among the populists in the past are Andrew Jackson, who in the 1830s advocated politics for the common man, the People's Party in the 1890s that called for the removal of monopolistic enterprises and relief for the poor, and the Prohibition Party movement in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Jackson hijacked the Democratic Party as Trump did the Republican Party, but the other populists vanished. In relatively recent 1992, independent Ross Perot urged administrative reform, tax cuts, deregulation, and small government. His policy proposals were eventually taken in by the established political parties. For example, all the policy measures Perot urged in 1992 were later stolen by Gingrich, who then crafted them into a Republican agenda. Perot launched the Reform Party in 1996 but to no avail.
Trump's America first-ism is also to disappear in due course. Yet, it is a reform within a major political party, which is a novelty that distinguishes him from other populists. Trump wanted to fight the 2000 presidential election as the Reform Party candidate. But Buchanan gained the party nomination and, even worse, lost the election. Trump learned then that a third-party candidate could not win the presidential election. At a 2016 Republican presidential primary election debate, Trump replied "no" when asked whether he would go to any third party if he failed to gain the party nomination.
Joe Biden will adopt some of the Trump administration's policies, such as the recovery of the manufacturing industry. However, regarding countermeasures against COVID-19, racial equity, and climate change, he will likely pursue different policies from Trump's. He will have to spend the next four years on rectifying the course of American politics. In that sense, Trump may be the one who will disappear, leaving short-lived rings in the water.
Lastly, I would like to present the results of a multi-answer survey undertaken by the Chicago Council regarding which foreign policy issues Republicans and Democrats consider to matter most. Republicans identify traditional security challenges as the most critical threats: 1) the development of China as a world power, 2) international terrorism, 3) the large numbers of immigrants and refugees coming into the United States, 4) domestic violent extremism, 5) Iran's nuclear program, 6) a global economic downturn, and 7) North Korea's nuclear program. Their concerns are roughly identical with the issues that the Trump administration has worked on in a populist manner. Democrats are most concerned about: 1) the COVID-19 pandemic, 2) climate change, 3) racial inequality in the United States, 4) foreign interference in American elections, 5) economic inequality in the United States, 6) a global economic downturn, and 7) political polarization in the United States. Their concerns converge chiefly on domestic issues rather than diplomacy. Democrats and Republicans diverge on US foreign policy; partisan differences are evident.
As experts will join the Biden administration, its foreign policy foci may not necessarily mirror Democrats' concerns illustrated in the above results. The Chicago Council survey clarifies that the US political society is polarized. The polarization will, in turn, affect US diplomacy.
(This paper was edited by the SSDP secretariat as the minutes of Maeshima's lecture.)
- March, 2021, "Can the Biden Administration Restore America as a Global Leader?" written by Matake Kamiya, Professor, the National Defense Academy of Japan.
- March, 2021, "The Biden Administration and Japan's Security Strategy" written by Hideshi Tokuchi, Senior Fellow, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies.
- February,2021, "US Foreign and Security Policy Direction Viewed from the Biden Administration's Lineup" written by Tsuneo Watanabe, Senior Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- February,2021, "Trade Policies of the Biden Administration" written by Takaaki Asano, Senior Analyst, Sumitomo Corporation Global Research Co. Ltd.
- February,2021, "The Biden Administration's Policy toward Russia" written by Taisuke Abiru, Senior Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- January,2021, "Will US Policy Toward China Change?" lectured by Ryo Sahashi, Associate Professor, the University of Tokyo
- January,2021, "How will China View the Biden Administration?" written by Bonji Ohara, Senior Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- January,2021, "An Assessment of the 2020 US Presidential Election－American Democracy Now－" lectured by Fumiaki Kubo, Professor, the University of Tokyo
- January,2021, "Two Trumpian Mysteries－Why did Trump win over 70 million votes? Why is his outrageous behavior unchecked?－" lectured by Kazuhiro Maeshima, Professor, Sophia University
- September, 2020, "The Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic and Internationa Relationsl" by Matake Kamiya, Professor, National Defense Academy of Japan
- September, 2020, "The Policy Agenda for the Xi Jinping Administration- COVID-19 Countermeasures and China's International Relations -" by Shin Kawashima, Professor, The University of Tokyo
- "Control in the United States and International Relations" by Koji Murata, Professor, Doshisha University
- September, 2020, "The EU's Response to COVID-19 and International Relations" by Yuichi Hosoya, Professor, Keio University
- August, 2020, "The Corona Crisis Seen from a Macroeconomic Perspective" written by Motoshige Itoh, Professor Emeritus, The University of Tokyo
- August, 2020, "The Coronavirus Pandemic and Japan's Infectious Disease Control" written by Takashi Mihara, Senior Research Fellow, NLI Research Institute
- August, 2020, "Infectious Disease Crisis Control in Japan- Recommendations on an Exit Strategy -" written by Kazumasa Oguro, Professor, Hosei University
- August, 2020, "Security against Infectious Disease Threats --- Policy Responses Abroad" written by Takashi Sekiyama, Associate Professor, Kyoto University
- June 2020,"Transformation of the International Order in the Middle East--- Varying Degrees of "Stateness" and Three Directions of the New Order" written by Satoshi Ikeuchi, Professor, Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo
- June 2020,"Destabilization in the Middle East and its Impacts on Japan's Energy Security" written by Amane Kobayashi, Research Fellow, The Institute of Energy Economics
- May 2020: Urgent Recommendations "Toward a V-shaped Recovery after the Novel Coronavirus Pandemic "Coronavirus Testing for All" --- the First Step of the Next Phase"
- May 2020: "US Diplomacy toward Iran: Economic Sanctions as a Diplomatic Tool" Hiroki Sugita Columnist, Kyodo News
- "Russian Factors in the Middle East" Taisuke Abiru Senior Research Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- "The SDF Dispatches to the Middle East --- History and Significance" Ippeita Nishida Senior Research Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- March 2020, "Space and Security" Kazuto Suzuki Professor, Hokkaido University
- March 2020, "The US Security Space Policy --- With a Focus on the Establishment of Two Space Forces" Yasuhito Fukushima Chief Researcher, The National Institute for Defense Studies
- March 2020, "China's Recent Activities in Space and Cyberspace" Bonji Ohara Senior Research Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- March 2020, "Environmental Security and Japan" Takashi Sekiyama Associate Professor, Kyoto University
- March 2020, "Changes in Global Environment and Security --- US Security Strategy" Hideshi Tokuchi Senior Fellow, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS)
- February 2020, "Cyberspace Security" Motohiro Tsuchiya Professor, Keio University
- February 2020, "Japan's Space and Cyberspace Policy" Yukinari Hirose Former President of the National Institute for Defense Studies
- December 2019, "The US-China Confrontation --- Where Will Hegemony Reside Next?" Akio Takahara Professor, the University of Tokyo
- December 2019, "Challenges Facing the Chinese Economy" Osamu Tanaka Chief Senior Researcher, Institute of Developing Economies, JETRO
- December 2019, "US Strategic Perception on China: Implications for US Allied Partners" Tsuneo Watanabe Senior Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- November 2019, "The Xi Jinping Administration's View of the International Order– China's emphasis on United Nations diplomacy and liberal economic policies−" Shin Kawashima, Professor, the University of Tokyo
- November 2019, "The Future of China's Security Strategy" Hideshi Tokuchi, Senior Fellow, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies
- November 2019, "China --- Its Confidence and Anxiety" Bonji Ohara, Senior Research Fellow, Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- August 2019: Several Perspectives on the Korean Peninsula Issue--- The Deteriorating Japan-South Korea Relationship and the Uncertain Denuclearization of North Korea --- By Masahiro Akiyama Chairman, the SSDP
- July 2019, "An Outlook on the Denuclearization of North Korea--- What is the Stance of North Korea?---", Junya Nishino, Professor, Keio University
- July 2019, "An Outlook on the Denuclearization of North Korea --- How will the US move?", Narushige Michishita, Vice President, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies
- July 2019, "Discussion on Denuclearization of North Korea", SSDP Discussion Meeting on May 8, 2019
- May 2019: "Current Status and Prospects of South Korea and Japan's Frictions over History: How to address the Judicial Problems", Masao Okonogi, Professor Emeritus, Keio University
- May 2019: "South Korea and Japan's Frictions over History" (Comments), Junya Nishino, Professor, Keio University
- May 2019: Japan and South Korea Relationships (Question & Answer)
- March 2019: "The Present State and Prospects of the Indian Economy and Economic Policies" written by Koji Kobayashi, Senior Economist Mizuho Research Institute Ltd.
- March 2019: "The "Modi diplomacy" in the History of Indian diplomacy--- Departure from or maintenance of the traditional diplomacy? ---" written by Toru Ito, The National Defense Academy of Japan
- February 2019: Dynamics of Indian Politics and the 2019 General Elections, written by Chiharu Takenaka, Professor of Rikkyo University
- February 2019: "Cooperative Strategy" to Realize "Competitive Strategy"--- The composite structure of Japan's "Free and Open Indo-Pacific" strategy (vision) ---, written by Matake Kamiya, Professor at The National Defense Academy of Japan
- January 2019:, A paper, "How will the US midterm elections results affect the Trump administration's foreign policy for 2019?" written by Tsuneo Watanabe, Senior Fellow, the Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- January 2019:, A paper, "The Present and Future of the International Trade Order" , written by Akihiko Tamura, Professor, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies
- December 2018: The US-China Competition and Japan, written by Ryo Sahashi, Professor at Kanagawa University
- December 2018: An Outlook for the US-China Trade War―What makes the two economically interdependent superpowers confront each other?―, written by Takashi Sekiyama, Associate professor at Toyo University
- September 2018: Proposal, "The Denuclearization of North Korea and the Restoration of Peace in the Korean Peninsula― Correct Perceptions and Eight Proposals on Japan's North Korea Diplomacy－" edited by the Society of Security and Diplomatic Policy Studies
- September 2018: "The Taiwan Policy of the Xi Jinping Administration in its Second Term: An Outlook on Cross-Strait Relations in the New Era" written by Yasuhiro Matsuda, Professor of the Tokyo University
- July 2018: "The EU States and Russia on North Korea Issues- Expansion of Influence through Diplomacy: Attempts and Limitations -" lectured by Yuichi Hosoya, Professor of Keio University
- "An Assessment of the US-North Korea Summit and an Outlook for the Future of the Korean Peninsula" lectured by Junya Nishino, Professor of Keio University
- "Korean Peninsula Issue and Japan's Future Security Policy" written by Hideshi Tokuchi, Senior Fellow of National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies
- July 2018: "US North Korea policy affected by personnel changes in the Trump administration" lectured by Tsuneo Watanabe, Senior Fellow of the Sasakawa Peace Foundation.
- "China-North Korea relationship under Xi Jinping" lectured by Shin Kawashima, Professor of the Tokyo University.
- "North Korean Denuclearization and Russia" lectured by Nobuo Shimotomai, Professor of the Hosei University.
- March 2018: "The Network Hegemony Theory for a Security Architecture in The Asia Pacific Region" lectured by Masahiro Akiyama, Chairman, the Society of Security and Diplomatic Policy Studies
- January 2018: "A Destabilized Middle East" lectured by Koichiro Tanaka, Professor, Keio University
- December 2017: "Problems in Sino-Japanese Relations, 1992-2042" lectured by Ezra F. Vogel, Professor of the Social Sciences Emeritus at Harvard University
- November 2017: "The Future of the Asia-Pacific Region" written by Yoriko Kawaguchi, Fellow, the Meiji Institute for Global Affairs, Former Minister Foreign Affairs
- October 2017: "A New Trend in India's Foreign Policy and Japan" Written by HIROSE,Takako, Professor, Senshu University
- August 2017: "The Shocks that shook the Transatlantic World and their Implication for Japan's Foreign Policy" written by HOSOYA, Yuichi, Professor, Keio University
- August 2017: "Does Economic Interdependence not Encourage Collaboration? ―Thinking Japan-China Relations from an Economic Perspective―" written by Takashi SEKIYAMA, Ph.D., Toyo University
- July 2017: Proposal article "The Trump Administration's Impact on the Cross-Strait Relations" written by Yasuhiro Matsuda, Ph.D.
- June 2017: Proposal article "The outlook for the relationship between two great powers and implications for Japanese diplomacy" written by Professor Shin Kawashima
- May 2017: (Emergency Proposal) Facing the Inconvenient Truth: Re-examining Policy for Peace and Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula (Chief author, Masao Okonogi)
- March 2017: "Economic Influences of the Trump Administration" written by Professor Motoshige Ito
- February, 2017: Proposal article "Trump's Foreign and Security Policy - Unpredictable President, Realistic Secretaries - " written by Mr. Tsuneo Watanabe is posted on the website of SSDP.
- December, 2016: Proposal article "Reconsidering North Korea Policy: How to Deal with a Nuclear Armed Divided States" written by Professor Masao Okonogi is posted on the website of SSDP.
- March 2021, Japan-ROK Parliamentary Dialogue -Japan-ROK Cooperation in the Era of US-China Competition- held on March 11, 2021
- December 2020: The report of the Japan-ROK Future Dialogue held on November 21 to discuss "Japan-ROK Cooperation in the Post-Covid-19 Era
- October 2020: "Responses to COVID-19 and Agendas for the Post-COVID-19 Era", A Brief Overview of the Japan-Korea Experts Dialogue held on July 29,30, 2020
- October 2020: "The China-Taiwan Confrontation over Corona Response and Taiwan's Security" written by Makoto Ogata, Former Chief of the Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association in Taipei
- May 2020: "Rivalries in the Middle East in New Security Dynamics", Written by Sayed Ghoneim, Major General (retired) of the Egyptian Armed Forces, Chairman, Institute for Global Security & Defence Affairs
- March 2020: The Japan-South Korea Relationship in a Cul-de-Sac--- Where is an Exit ? Masao Okonogi Professor Emeritus, Keio Universit
- December 2019: The Hong Kong Upheaval and the Future of Cross-Straits Relations－The 2019 Japan-Taiwan Strategic Dialogue Report OGATA, Makoto Former Chief of the Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association in Taipei
- August 2019: Report; 2019 FUTURE CONSENSUS DIALOGUE --Sustainable Prosperity and Future of Korea-U.S.-Japan Cooperation-- By Future Consensus Institute (Yeosijae)
- June 2019: Report on India – Japan Security Dialogue 2019 by Ms. Vindu Mai Chotani, Ph.D Student, The University of Tokyo
June 2019: Four papers on Japan-India Cooperation submitted to India-Japan Security Dialogue 2019
Japan's Rationale for a Free and Open Indo-Pacific Vision
Tsuneo Watanabe, Senior Fellow, The Sasakawa Peace Foundation
The Significance and Possibilities of India-Japan Cooperation in the Concept of the Indo-Pacific
Toru ITO Associate Professor, National Defense Academy of Japan
Japan-India Defense Cooperation in the Indo-Pacific Context - Operationalizing the Security Aspect of the Indo-Pacific Vision –
Hideshi Tokuchi, Senior Fellow, National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS)
India-US-Japan Defense Cooperation: What's next?
Dr. Satoru Nagao, Hudson Institute
- Japan's Rationale for a Free and Open Indo-Pacific Vision
- November 2018: "The Present State of the Japanese Economy and Policy Issues" lectured by Motoshige Itoh, Professor Emeritus at the University of Tokyo.
- November 2018: "Expanding Social Security Expenses and Fiscal Reforms" lectured by Kazumasa Oguro, Professor at Hosei University.
- September 2018: "Taiwan Identity and Cross-Strait Relations and Trump's Taiwan Policy and the Future of Taiwan-US Relations-Discussion at The Second Japan-Taiwan Strategic Dialogue (June 21, 2018, Taipei)-" written by OGATA, Makoto
- September 2018: "Japan-Taiwan Dialogue 2018 Minutes", 21st June 2018, Taipei, Taiwan.
- July 2018: Report on The Second Japan – Philippines Strategic Dialogue prepared by Ms. Vindu Mai Chotani, Ph.D. Student, Graduate School of Public Policy, Tokyo University.
- May 2018: "Civilian Control "at Crisis"? – Perhaps Not, for the Case of the Field Sit-reps from SDF's South Sudan Mission" reported by Ippeita Nishida, Research Fellow, the Sasakawa Peace Foundation
- January 2018: "Fukushima, Genki？Project－Young Taiwanese volunteers introduce the facts on Fukushima's revival through documentary films－" reported by OGATA, Makoto, Former Chief of the Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association in Taipei
- December 2017: "Commemorating a Quarter Century of Dispatches of the JSDF's PKO Units: Challenges and Possibilities in the Post South Sudan" written by Takayuki Shoji, Lecturer, Nihon University
- November 2017: "19th CCP National Congress" written by Mr. Bonji Ohara, Senior Research Fellow, the Sasakawa Peace Fondation
- October 2017: "What is Japan's Role in the Indo-China border conflict?" written by Dr. NGAO,Satoru, Research Fellow, Institute for Future Engineering
- July 2017: "Overview of the Current Situation in Taiwan-" the Naturally Independent Generation" will affect the Taiwan"s politics-" written by Makoto Ogata MGE.(Ret.)
- June 2017: "Japan-U.S. Economic Dialogue" written by Mr.Takaaki Asano
- March 2017: "The Japan-Philippines Strategic Dialogue" written by Mr. Hideshi Tokuchi
- February, 2017: Current topic "The Importance of Japan's Security Role Under Trump" written by Dr. Satoru Nagao is posted on the SSDP website.
- December, 2016: Current topic "Widening Security Task: Will SDF do the Job?" written by Mr. Ippeita Nishida is posted on the SSDP website.
- March 2021: Research journal "Security Studies (vol3 no1) "- US Foreign Policy in the Biden Administration / The 2020 US Presidential Election and American Democracy -(English edition)
- December 2020: A research journal "Security Studies (vol2 no4) "- Normalize Japan-South Korea Relations trough Dialogues -(English edition)
- September 2020: A research journal "Security Studies (vol2 no3) "-The Novel Coronavirus and Security-(English edition)
- July 2020: A research journal "Security Studies (vol2 no2) - Middle East Situation and Japan's Security - " (English edition) was published
- May 2020: A research journal "Security Studies (vol2 no1) - Cyber, Space, Environment and Security - " March 2020 (English edition)
- February 2020, "A research journal "Security Studies (vol1 no4) " (English edition)"
- September 2019: A research journal "Security Studies (vol1 no3) " (English edition)
- August 2019: Korea-Japan Joint Seminar: FUTURE CONSENSUS DIALOGUE
- April 2019: "Security Studies (vol1 no2) April 2019"
- March 2019: A research journal "Security Studies vol1 no01" just published
- February 2019: The Denuclearization of North Korea and the Takeshima Issue
- December 2018: Former Vice Defense Minister Masahiro Akiyama's Memoirs (An Ad)
- November 2018: Participation in the Future Consensus Forum held in Beijing
- September 2018: "2018 Indo-Pacific Security Dialogue" reported by Masahiro Akiyama
- 2017 December: "The Butterfly Project-A possibility of showing a solution to the North Korea problem-"
- October 2017: Campaign on the problems with North Korea
- August 2017: A New Containment Policy Strategy
- June 2017: Korean peninsla
- March 2017: President Duterte
- February, 2017: Kazakhstan
- November, 2016: Participated in Astana Club 2016 held in Kazakhstan on November 14- 16, 2016.